Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes

United Nations discussions on the governance of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction have questioned, but not yet reached a decision, on whether existing institutional agreements and structures are sufficient to meet global commitments to protect marine biodiversity, or if additional mechanisms...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freestone, David, Johnson, David, Ardron, Jeff, Morrison, Kate Killerlain, Unger, Sebastian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X1300290X
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:marpol:v:49:y:2014:i:c:p:167-175
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:marpol:v:49:y:2014:i:c:p:167-175 2024-04-14T08:16:16+00:00 Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes Freestone, David Johnson, David Ardron, Jeff Morrison, Kate Killerlain Unger, Sebastian http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X1300290X unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X1300290X article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:27:52Z United Nations discussions on the governance of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction have questioned, but not yet reached a decision, on whether existing institutional agreements and structures are sufficient to meet global commitments to protect marine biodiversity, or if additional mechanisms may be required. This paper considers two very different efforts to protect marine biodiversity in these areas: (1) in the North-East Atlantic through the efforts of OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic; and (2) in the central Atlantic, through the efforts of the Sargasso Sea Alliance led by the Bermuda government. In each case, action has been strongly supported by non-governmental organisations and subsequent progress has hinged upon on-going dedicated efforts of “champion” governments to bring other States on board. This paper outlines the difficulties that they have faced, and consequently why they have been time-consuming, and are not yet completed. The paper then considers 10 common recommendations that can be drawn from the experiences of these two distinct initiatives, and their relevance to on-going UN deliberations. High seas; Biological diversity; Areas beyond national jurisdiction; ABNJ; MPA; Marine governance; Article in Journal/Newspaper North East Atlantic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description United Nations discussions on the governance of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction have questioned, but not yet reached a decision, on whether existing institutional agreements and structures are sufficient to meet global commitments to protect marine biodiversity, or if additional mechanisms may be required. This paper considers two very different efforts to protect marine biodiversity in these areas: (1) in the North-East Atlantic through the efforts of OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic; and (2) in the central Atlantic, through the efforts of the Sargasso Sea Alliance led by the Bermuda government. In each case, action has been strongly supported by non-governmental organisations and subsequent progress has hinged upon on-going dedicated efforts of “champion” governments to bring other States on board. This paper outlines the difficulties that they have faced, and consequently why they have been time-consuming, and are not yet completed. The paper then considers 10 common recommendations that can be drawn from the experiences of these two distinct initiatives, and their relevance to on-going UN deliberations. High seas; Biological diversity; Areas beyond national jurisdiction; ABNJ; MPA; Marine governance;
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Freestone, David
Johnson, David
Ardron, Jeff
Morrison, Kate Killerlain
Unger, Sebastian
spellingShingle Freestone, David
Johnson, David
Ardron, Jeff
Morrison, Kate Killerlain
Unger, Sebastian
Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes
author_facet Freestone, David
Johnson, David
Ardron, Jeff
Morrison, Kate Killerlain
Unger, Sebastian
author_sort Freestone, David
title Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes
title_short Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes
title_full Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes
title_fullStr Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes
title_full_unstemmed Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes
title_sort can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? experiences from two on-going processes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X1300290X
genre North East Atlantic
genre_facet North East Atlantic
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X1300290X
_version_ 1796314907065450496