Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain

A checklist is provided for monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) actions to be applied in the areal-based management of marine fisheries and attached biodiversity conservation needs. The application of MCS to underpin compliance enforcement in marine protected and specially managed areas is se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miller, Denzil G.M., Slicer, Natasha M., Hanich, Quentin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X12002023
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:marpol:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:64-71
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:marpol:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:64-71 2024-04-14T08:02:38+00:00 Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain Miller, Denzil G.M. Slicer, Natasha M. Hanich, Quentin http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X12002023 unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X12002023 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:27:34Z A checklist is provided for monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) actions to be applied in the areal-based management of marine fisheries and attached biodiversity conservation needs. The application of MCS to underpin compliance enforcement in marine protected and specially managed areas is seen as important in addressing such needs. Spatial, temporal, management and practical considerations are identified as important implementing considerations for effective MCS-based compliance enforcement. Most notably, human activity impact mitigation appears to possess the greatest potential to reduce potentially-harmful and cumulative long-term effects across all relevant spatial-temporal ranges considered. Equally, selection of suitable MCS approaches requires careful consideration of spatial and/or temporal constraints, as well as regulatory requirements. Express reference is therefore made to conservation measures adopted by the Commission of the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) as examples of where specific, areal-based, precautionary, ecosystem-directed and operational MCS measures have been applied. It is concluded that customary MCS measures are suitable for both fisheries management and biodiversity conservation in protected, or specially managed, areas. The importance of cost-benefit considerations, management feedback and information review is also discussed in the context of minimising protected-area MCS costs. Marine protected areas; Monitoring control and surveillance (MCS); Fisheries management; Ecosystem management; Biodiversity protection; CCAMLR; Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description A checklist is provided for monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) actions to be applied in the areal-based management of marine fisheries and attached biodiversity conservation needs. The application of MCS to underpin compliance enforcement in marine protected and specially managed areas is seen as important in addressing such needs. Spatial, temporal, management and practical considerations are identified as important implementing considerations for effective MCS-based compliance enforcement. Most notably, human activity impact mitigation appears to possess the greatest potential to reduce potentially-harmful and cumulative long-term effects across all relevant spatial-temporal ranges considered. Equally, selection of suitable MCS approaches requires careful consideration of spatial and/or temporal constraints, as well as regulatory requirements. Express reference is therefore made to conservation measures adopted by the Commission of the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) as examples of where specific, areal-based, precautionary, ecosystem-directed and operational MCS measures have been applied. It is concluded that customary MCS measures are suitable for both fisheries management and biodiversity conservation in protected, or specially managed, areas. The importance of cost-benefit considerations, management feedback and information review is also discussed in the context of minimising protected-area MCS costs. Marine protected areas; Monitoring control and surveillance (MCS); Fisheries management; Ecosystem management; Biodiversity protection; CCAMLR;
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Miller, Denzil G.M.
Slicer, Natasha M.
Hanich, Quentin
spellingShingle Miller, Denzil G.M.
Slicer, Natasha M.
Hanich, Quentin
Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
author_facet Miller, Denzil G.M.
Slicer, Natasha M.
Hanich, Quentin
author_sort Miller, Denzil G.M.
title Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_short Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_full Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_fullStr Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
title_sort monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X12002023
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X12002023
_version_ 1796316294311575552