Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia

Forest industry companies are the chief exploiters of forest resources, and their day-to-day decisions and actions may have major implications for the sustainable development of forests, and for those who depend on them. Russian companies have a special place in this regard as they operate in the mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Senko, Sergei, Pykäläinen, Jouni
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934119301613
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:forpol:v:120:y:2020:i:c:s1389934119301613
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:forpol:v:120:y:2020:i:c:s1389934119301613 2024-04-14T08:14:17+00:00 Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia Senko, Sergei Pykäläinen, Jouni http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934119301613 unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934119301613 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:36:50Z Forest industry companies are the chief exploiters of forest resources, and their day-to-day decisions and actions may have major implications for the sustainable development of forests, and for those who depend on them. Russian companies have a special place in this regard as they operate in the most forested country in the world and the local forest resources have considerable global effects. In this study, the concerns and views of an expert group from Russian wood harvesting companies in regard to forests and forestry development in the long term are scrutinized through a case study in Republic of Karelia, one of the main forest regions in Russia. The study employed a two-stage survey carried out by interviewing representatives from the companies in order to identify critical issues that they think will influence long-term forestry development. The survey combined an unstructured interview approach for the first stage and cumulative voting (CV) for the second. The identified data were summarized into a PESTE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological and Environmental) framework to obtain a general overview of the macro environments in the study area. The results show that the companies' views were mainly influenced by the technological, political and economic issues faced by the Russian forestry sector last decades, while social and environmental dimensions were considered of minor significance. The companies did not refer to the concept of sustainable development. Forestry was largely associated with the management of own business demands. Bioeconomy; Sustainable development; Strategic planning; Russia; Boreal forest; Cumulative voting; Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* Republic of Karelia RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Forest industry companies are the chief exploiters of forest resources, and their day-to-day decisions and actions may have major implications for the sustainable development of forests, and for those who depend on them. Russian companies have a special place in this regard as they operate in the most forested country in the world and the local forest resources have considerable global effects. In this study, the concerns and views of an expert group from Russian wood harvesting companies in regard to forests and forestry development in the long term are scrutinized through a case study in Republic of Karelia, one of the main forest regions in Russia. The study employed a two-stage survey carried out by interviewing representatives from the companies in order to identify critical issues that they think will influence long-term forestry development. The survey combined an unstructured interview approach for the first stage and cumulative voting (CV) for the second. The identified data were summarized into a PESTE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological and Environmental) framework to obtain a general overview of the macro environments in the study area. The results show that the companies' views were mainly influenced by the technological, political and economic issues faced by the Russian forestry sector last decades, while social and environmental dimensions were considered of minor significance. The companies did not refer to the concept of sustainable development. Forestry was largely associated with the management of own business demands. Bioeconomy; Sustainable development; Strategic planning; Russia; Boreal forest; Cumulative voting;
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Senko, Sergei
Pykäläinen, Jouni
spellingShingle Senko, Sergei
Pykäläinen, Jouni
Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia
author_facet Senko, Sergei
Pykäläinen, Jouni
author_sort Senko, Sergei
title Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia
title_short Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia
title_full Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia
title_fullStr Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in Russia: A case study in Republic of Karelia
title_sort exploring the views of forest industry companies on the long-term forestry development in russia: a case study in republic of karelia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934119301613
genre karelia*
Republic of Karelia
genre_facet karelia*
Republic of Karelia
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934119301613
_version_ 1796312465414291456