Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation

The 2017 Traditional Owner evaluation of the implementation of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan developed an approach to evaluation that tested the use of Standpoint Theory in the field of natural resource management. This methodological choice was intended to enable First Nation approaches to data gen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goff, Susan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718919300242
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s0149718919300242
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:epplan:v:79:y:2020:i:c:s0149718919300242 2024-04-14T08:11:43+00:00 Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation Goff, Susan http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718919300242 unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718919300242 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:30:27Z The 2017 Traditional Owner evaluation of the implementation of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan developed an approach to evaluation that tested the use of Standpoint Theory in the field of natural resource management. This methodological choice was intended to enable First Nation approaches to data generation and use in equal measure to non-indigenous approaches. The method is implemented as a nested, up-hierarchy of scale, enabling a pan-optican dimension of vision from "below" and "above". The paper does not present the evaluative results regarding the implementation of the Plan because that information is co-owned by the participating Nations for their uses. Instead, and in respect of that arrangement, the paper presents the evaluation practices funded by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority. The methodology was negotiated and implemented with the Nations in the pilot study as a co-production across cultural boundaries. The approach was then evaluated by the participants, and these results are reported. All those reviewing the methodology were directly involved in some aspect of the evaluation, 64 % of whom identified as Traditional Owners, 67 % of whom were involved in high level decision-making about the evaluation approach. Traditional Owners rated cultural competence of the tested approach at 68 %, the benefits of the approach at 75 %, satisfaction with the standard of the evaluation at 72 %, and satisfaction with complying with the Basin Plan’s requirements for evaluation at 78 %. Recommendations for broader engagement and better science communication are made. Standpoint Theory; Participatory Research; First Nations Peoples; Cross-cultural engagement; Natural resource management; Systemic critical thinking; Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The 2017 Traditional Owner evaluation of the implementation of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan developed an approach to evaluation that tested the use of Standpoint Theory in the field of natural resource management. This methodological choice was intended to enable First Nation approaches to data generation and use in equal measure to non-indigenous approaches. The method is implemented as a nested, up-hierarchy of scale, enabling a pan-optican dimension of vision from "below" and "above". The paper does not present the evaluative results regarding the implementation of the Plan because that information is co-owned by the participating Nations for their uses. Instead, and in respect of that arrangement, the paper presents the evaluation practices funded by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority. The methodology was negotiated and implemented with the Nations in the pilot study as a co-production across cultural boundaries. The approach was then evaluated by the participants, and these results are reported. All those reviewing the methodology were directly involved in some aspect of the evaluation, 64 % of whom identified as Traditional Owners, 67 % of whom were involved in high level decision-making about the evaluation approach. Traditional Owners rated cultural competence of the tested approach at 68 %, the benefits of the approach at 75 %, satisfaction with the standard of the evaluation at 72 %, and satisfaction with complying with the Basin Plan’s requirements for evaluation at 78 %. Recommendations for broader engagement and better science communication are made. Standpoint Theory; Participatory Research; First Nations Peoples; Cross-cultural engagement; Natural resource management; Systemic critical thinking;
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Goff, Susan
spellingShingle Goff, Susan
Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation
author_facet Goff, Susan
author_sort Goff, Susan
title Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation
title_short Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation
title_full Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation
title_fullStr Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Visionary evaluation: Approaching Aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation
title_sort visionary evaluation: approaching aboriginal ontological equity in water management evaluation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718919300242
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718919300242
_version_ 1796309438695473152