Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions

The article examines the institutional dimensions of Russia׳s gas policy toward Northeast Asia (NEA11The geographical boundaries of NEA remain loose and are often interpreted variously depending on a purpose of a specific enquiry. This study centres on NEA as being informed by the Russian Federation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shadrina, Elena
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514003978
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:enepol:v:74:y:2014:i:c:p:54-67
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:enepol:v:74:y:2014:i:c:p:54-67 2024-04-14T08:18:51+00:00 Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions Shadrina, Elena http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514003978 unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514003978 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:29:01Z The article examines the institutional dimensions of Russia׳s gas policy toward Northeast Asia (NEA11The geographical boundaries of NEA remain loose and are often interpreted variously depending on a purpose of a specific enquiry. This study centres on NEA as being informed by the Russian Federation, Japan, the People’s Republic of China (China) and the Republic of Korea (Korea). While analysing Russia’s gas relations with the latter three, the article refers to them as NEA-3. During the liberal economic reforms of the 1990s, development of natural gas deposits in the Russian Far East was made possible under the scheme of production sharing agreements (PSA). However, new PSAs were banned in Russia even before the advent of state capitalism in the early 2000s. This was, to a large extent, the result of strong anti-PSA lobbying led by the domestic energy business elite. Consequently, Russia׳s gas policy in the east began evolving from being project-specific toward being region-specific. Contemporary Russian gas policy toward NEA relies upon domestic (national and regional) and external institutions. In 2009, following the completion of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Sakhalin, Russia entered NEA gas markets. Transformations in the international gas markets facilitated the establishment of a two-pattern gas export policy in Russia in 2013. Under this policy, Russia׳s EU-oriented pipeline gas export remains monopolised by Gazprom, while Asia-oriented LNG export is partially liberalised. Russia has not been experiencing institutional discrepancy in NEA gas markets. However, as the markets evolve toward greater coordination, a rational option for Russia is to genuinely liberalise its gas policy. Institutions; Gas policy; Russia; Eastern Siberia and Far East (ESFE); Northeast Asia (NEA); Article in Journal/Newspaper Sakhalin Siberia RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The article examines the institutional dimensions of Russia׳s gas policy toward Northeast Asia (NEA11The geographical boundaries of NEA remain loose and are often interpreted variously depending on a purpose of a specific enquiry. This study centres on NEA as being informed by the Russian Federation, Japan, the People’s Republic of China (China) and the Republic of Korea (Korea). While analysing Russia’s gas relations with the latter three, the article refers to them as NEA-3. During the liberal economic reforms of the 1990s, development of natural gas deposits in the Russian Far East was made possible under the scheme of production sharing agreements (PSA). However, new PSAs were banned in Russia even before the advent of state capitalism in the early 2000s. This was, to a large extent, the result of strong anti-PSA lobbying led by the domestic energy business elite. Consequently, Russia׳s gas policy in the east began evolving from being project-specific toward being region-specific. Contemporary Russian gas policy toward NEA relies upon domestic (national and regional) and external institutions. In 2009, following the completion of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Sakhalin, Russia entered NEA gas markets. Transformations in the international gas markets facilitated the establishment of a two-pattern gas export policy in Russia in 2013. Under this policy, Russia׳s EU-oriented pipeline gas export remains monopolised by Gazprom, while Asia-oriented LNG export is partially liberalised. Russia has not been experiencing institutional discrepancy in NEA gas markets. However, as the markets evolve toward greater coordination, a rational option for Russia is to genuinely liberalise its gas policy. Institutions; Gas policy; Russia; Eastern Siberia and Far East (ESFE); Northeast Asia (NEA);
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shadrina, Elena
spellingShingle Shadrina, Elena
Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions
author_facet Shadrina, Elena
author_sort Shadrina, Elena
title Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions
title_short Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions
title_full Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions
title_fullStr Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions
title_full_unstemmed Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions
title_sort russia׳s natural gas policy toward northeast asia: rationales, objectives and institutions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514003978
genre Sakhalin
Siberia
genre_facet Sakhalin
Siberia
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421514003978
_version_ 1796318398684069888