The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling
This paper examines the likely impact of developing U.S. energy resources on oil prices. In addition, we examine the benefits and costs of allowing drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the areas of the Outer Continental Shelf that were until recently closed to drilling. We find that a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(09)00246-1 |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:638-650 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:638-650 2024-04-14T08:07:32+00:00 The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling Hahn, Robert Passell, Peter http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(09)00246-1 unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(09)00246-1 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:31:10Z This paper examines the likely impact of developing U.S. energy resources on oil prices. In addition, we examine the benefits and costs of allowing drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the areas of the Outer Continental Shelf that were until recently closed to drilling. We find that allowing oil drilling in ANWR and the off-limits OCS would be likely to have a very modest impact on oil prices--on the order of 1%. However, a benefit-cost analysis of developing ANWR and off-limits OCS suggests that the benefits are likely to exceed the costs. Energy economics Environmental economics Resource economics Oil Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
This paper examines the likely impact of developing U.S. energy resources on oil prices. In addition, we examine the benefits and costs of allowing drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the areas of the Outer Continental Shelf that were until recently closed to drilling. We find that allowing oil drilling in ANWR and the off-limits OCS would be likely to have a very modest impact on oil prices--on the order of 1%. However, a benefit-cost analysis of developing ANWR and off-limits OCS suggests that the benefits are likely to exceed the costs. Energy economics Environmental economics Resource economics Oil |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hahn, Robert Passell, Peter |
spellingShingle |
Hahn, Robert Passell, Peter The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling |
author_facet |
Hahn, Robert Passell, Peter |
author_sort |
Hahn, Robert |
title |
The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling |
title_short |
The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling |
title_full |
The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling |
title_fullStr |
The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling |
title_full_unstemmed |
The economics of allowing more U.S. oil drilling |
title_sort |
economics of allowing more u.s. oil drilling |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(09)00246-1 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_relation |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140-9883(09)00246-1 |
_version_ |
1796304941888831488 |