Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies

The negative impact of human endeavour on the biosphere has becoming increasingly clear in recent decades. This has spurred a surge in the creation of sustainability indicators. One of the most used sustainability indicators of recent years is the Ecological Footprint (EF). The EF uses trade flows t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jóhannesson, S.E., Davíðsdóttir, B., Heinonen, J.T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916315221
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:146:y:2018:i:c:p:370-380
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:146:y:2018:i:c:p:370-380 2024-04-14T08:13:41+00:00 Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies Jóhannesson, S.E. Davíðsdóttir, B. Heinonen, J.T. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916315221 unknown http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916315221 article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:30:54Z The negative impact of human endeavour on the biosphere has becoming increasingly clear in recent decades. This has spurred a surge in the creation of sustainability indicators. One of the most used sustainability indicators of recent years is the Ecological Footprint (EF). The EF uses trade flows to estimate environmental impacts of consumption. The purpose of this study was to test EF's ability to deal with a small but highly specialized economy. For this we used Iceland as a case study but the Icelandic economy is dominated by strong specialization, with fisheries dwarfing all other sectors. Global Footprint Network's standard methodology was utilized with only the addition of local data being used where these data proved more robust than international databases. The results from the two editions of the GFN calculation models, 2008 and 2014, yielded a footprint of 56.59 and 25.26gha, per capita, respectively, for Iceland. Three main reasons were identified for the drop in the footprint between the two editions, all within the fishing grounds footprint: A much improved coverage of extraction rates, changes in fish species trophic levels and changes to aggregate errors for traded cod and halibut. A correction of CO2 intensities for exports also had a big impact but resulted in a rise in the EF for the latter edition. The study highlighted the rapid development of the methodology as a major strength while the method's main weakness was revealed as the uncertainties associated with the marine footprint. Local consumption figures from the Icelandic Directorate of Health indicated that a further drop in the marine footprint is in store with increased accuracy of the method, mainly to do with accurate allocation between export and consumption footprints. Although the indicator's accuracy has been much improved in recent years, additional improvements are thus still needed. The extremes of the Icelandic economy highlight errors to the extent that the huge footprint the calculations yielded make the country an outlier ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Endeavour ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The negative impact of human endeavour on the biosphere has becoming increasingly clear in recent decades. This has spurred a surge in the creation of sustainability indicators. One of the most used sustainability indicators of recent years is the Ecological Footprint (EF). The EF uses trade flows to estimate environmental impacts of consumption. The purpose of this study was to test EF's ability to deal with a small but highly specialized economy. For this we used Iceland as a case study but the Icelandic economy is dominated by strong specialization, with fisheries dwarfing all other sectors. Global Footprint Network's standard methodology was utilized with only the addition of local data being used where these data proved more robust than international databases. The results from the two editions of the GFN calculation models, 2008 and 2014, yielded a footprint of 56.59 and 25.26gha, per capita, respectively, for Iceland. Three main reasons were identified for the drop in the footprint between the two editions, all within the fishing grounds footprint: A much improved coverage of extraction rates, changes in fish species trophic levels and changes to aggregate errors for traded cod and halibut. A correction of CO2 intensities for exports also had a big impact but resulted in a rise in the EF for the latter edition. The study highlighted the rapid development of the methodology as a major strength while the method's main weakness was revealed as the uncertainties associated with the marine footprint. Local consumption figures from the Icelandic Directorate of Health indicated that a further drop in the marine footprint is in store with increased accuracy of the method, mainly to do with accurate allocation between export and consumption footprints. Although the indicator's accuracy has been much improved in recent years, additional improvements are thus still needed. The extremes of the Icelandic economy highlight errors to the extent that the huge footprint the calculations yielded make the country an outlier ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jóhannesson, S.E.
Davíðsdóttir, B.
Heinonen, J.T.
spellingShingle Jóhannesson, S.E.
Davíðsdóttir, B.
Heinonen, J.T.
Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies
author_facet Jóhannesson, S.E.
Davíðsdóttir, B.
Heinonen, J.T.
author_sort Jóhannesson, S.E.
title Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies
title_short Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies
title_full Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies
title_fullStr Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies
title_full_unstemmed Standard Ecological Footprint Method for Small, Highly Specialized Economies
title_sort standard ecological footprint method for small, highly specialized economies
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916315221
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550)
geographic Endeavour
geographic_facet Endeavour
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800916315221
_version_ 1796311716565352448