Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017

National elections for the legislature and/or the executive are held in almost all countries around the globe. This development has the potential to strengthen democracy. Yet, numerous contests suffer from electoral malpractice, whether from unfair laws, gerrymandered boundaries, restrictions on the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norris, Pippa, Gromping, Max
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1534
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp17-018
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ecl:harjfk:rwp17-018 2024-04-14T08:13:54+00:00 Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017 Norris, Pippa Gromping, Max https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1534 unknown https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1534 preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:27:30Z National elections for the legislature and/or the executive are held in almost all countries around the globe. This development has the potential to strengthen democracy. Yet, numerous contests suffer from electoral malpractice, whether from unfair laws, gerrymandered boundaries, restrictions on the free press, maladministration, election-related violence, ballot box fraud, or the abuse of money in politics. How widespread are these problems? For updated evidence, this report draws upon the fifth release of the Perceptions of Electoral Integrity dataset (PEI 5.0), in May 2017. This dataset compares the views of 2,709 experts who have evaluated electoral integrity in 158 countries holding 241 national elections from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2016. Part II of the report summarizes the latest results by global region and highlights selected cases to go beyond the numbers, contrasting positive and negative practices. We focus on several elections held in 2015 and 2016--including the UK and Iceland in Western Europe, the United States in the Americas, Australia and the Philippines in Asia Pacific, Russia and Lithuania in Central and Eastern Europe, Iran and Syria in the MENA region, and The Gambia and Gabon in Sub-Saharan Africa. Part III examines two major challenges--electoral corruption and coercion. The EIP project has developed new measures to monitor the extent of these problems--where they occur and what conditions these malpractices commonly undermine electoral integrity. Are these techniques of carrots and sticks deployed separately--or are they combined? More systematic evidence about these problems can provide insights about how best to target reforms and what policies have proved most effective. Part IV focuses on populist threats to electoral integrity. We first compare several recent European elections to see whether contemporary support for populist parties is rising or stalled, including in the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany. We then identify three mechanisms whereby populism ... Report Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description National elections for the legislature and/or the executive are held in almost all countries around the globe. This development has the potential to strengthen democracy. Yet, numerous contests suffer from electoral malpractice, whether from unfair laws, gerrymandered boundaries, restrictions on the free press, maladministration, election-related violence, ballot box fraud, or the abuse of money in politics. How widespread are these problems? For updated evidence, this report draws upon the fifth release of the Perceptions of Electoral Integrity dataset (PEI 5.0), in May 2017. This dataset compares the views of 2,709 experts who have evaluated electoral integrity in 158 countries holding 241 national elections from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2016. Part II of the report summarizes the latest results by global region and highlights selected cases to go beyond the numbers, contrasting positive and negative practices. We focus on several elections held in 2015 and 2016--including the UK and Iceland in Western Europe, the United States in the Americas, Australia and the Philippines in Asia Pacific, Russia and Lithuania in Central and Eastern Europe, Iran and Syria in the MENA region, and The Gambia and Gabon in Sub-Saharan Africa. Part III examines two major challenges--electoral corruption and coercion. The EIP project has developed new measures to monitor the extent of these problems--where they occur and what conditions these malpractices commonly undermine electoral integrity. Are these techniques of carrots and sticks deployed separately--or are they combined? More systematic evidence about these problems can provide insights about how best to target reforms and what policies have proved most effective. Part IV focuses on populist threats to electoral integrity. We first compare several recent European elections to see whether contemporary support for populist parties is rising or stalled, including in the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany. We then identify three mechanisms whereby populism ...
format Report
author Norris, Pippa
Gromping, Max
spellingShingle Norris, Pippa
Gromping, Max
Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017
author_facet Norris, Pippa
Gromping, Max
author_sort Norris, Pippa
title Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017
title_short Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017
title_full Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017
title_fullStr Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017
title_full_unstemmed Populist Threats to Electoral Integrity: The Year in Elections 2016-2017
title_sort populist threats to electoral integrity: the year in elections 2016-2017
url https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1534
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1534
_version_ 1796312002093645824