An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure

Municipal governments own and maintain two-thirds of Canada’s stock of public infrastructure. This burden is met by municipalities within the parameters afforded to them by their respective provinces. As a result, municipalities throughout the country rely on three primary revenue streams: issuing d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Almos T. Tassonyi, Brian W. Conger
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/municipal-capital-infrastructure-tassonyi-conger.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:clh:resear:v:8:y:2015:i:38
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:clh:resear:v:8:y:2015:i:38 2024-04-14T08:20:47+00:00 An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure Almos T. Tassonyi Brian W. Conger http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/municipal-capital-infrastructure-tassonyi-conger.pdf unknown http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/municipal-capital-infrastructure-tassonyi-conger.pdf article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:39:56Z Municipal governments own and maintain two-thirds of Canada’s stock of public infrastructure. This burden is met by municipalities within the parameters afforded to them by their respective provinces. As a result, municipalities throughout the country rely on three primary revenue streams: issuing debt, financing from dedicated revenue and transfers from higher levels of government. At the same time, strict rules on borrowing, sometimes self-imposed, have left municipalities with considerable unrealized borrowing capacity. Importantly, a shift towards increased borrowing, away from a reliance on intergovernmental grants, would reinforce the linkage between local government spending and accountability and keep spending priorities in order. This paper focuses on infrastructure spending in Alberta and Ontario to illuminate how municipalities in both provinces cope with demands to provide capital- and labour-intensive programs and services. In both provinces, transportation, environmental services and recreation and culture comprise the bulk of infrastructure expenditure. In Ontario, as of 2013, 18 of the largest municipalities held assets valued at $111.8 billion. After accumulated depreciation, those assets are now estimated to be worth $73.8 billion, having lost $38 billion in value since their acquisition — although municipalities’ diligence varies. Mississauga has preserved 82.6 per cent of its assets’ original cost; Thunder Bay has only managed 45.6 per cent. In Alberta, 21 of the largest municipalities held assets valued at $51.7 billion in 2013, although thanks to depreciation, their value is now estimated at $37.8 billion. Again, there is significant variability between municipalities, with Wood Buffalo having preserved 98.6 per cent of its assets’ original value, and Crowsnest Pass with 43.9 per cent. In both provinces, the older the municipality and the weaker its fiscal capacity, the lower the net book value of its capital assets. While an ongoing nation-wide shift to modified accrual accounting has ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Wood Buffalo RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Wood Buffalo ENVELOPE(-112.007,-112.007,57.664,57.664) Thunder Bay ENVELOPE(68.885,68.885,-49.325,-49.325) Crowsnest ENVELOPE(-55.865,-55.865,52.733,52.733)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Municipal governments own and maintain two-thirds of Canada’s stock of public infrastructure. This burden is met by municipalities within the parameters afforded to them by their respective provinces. As a result, municipalities throughout the country rely on three primary revenue streams: issuing debt, financing from dedicated revenue and transfers from higher levels of government. At the same time, strict rules on borrowing, sometimes self-imposed, have left municipalities with considerable unrealized borrowing capacity. Importantly, a shift towards increased borrowing, away from a reliance on intergovernmental grants, would reinforce the linkage between local government spending and accountability and keep spending priorities in order. This paper focuses on infrastructure spending in Alberta and Ontario to illuminate how municipalities in both provinces cope with demands to provide capital- and labour-intensive programs and services. In both provinces, transportation, environmental services and recreation and culture comprise the bulk of infrastructure expenditure. In Ontario, as of 2013, 18 of the largest municipalities held assets valued at $111.8 billion. After accumulated depreciation, those assets are now estimated to be worth $73.8 billion, having lost $38 billion in value since their acquisition — although municipalities’ diligence varies. Mississauga has preserved 82.6 per cent of its assets’ original cost; Thunder Bay has only managed 45.6 per cent. In Alberta, 21 of the largest municipalities held assets valued at $51.7 billion in 2013, although thanks to depreciation, their value is now estimated at $37.8 billion. Again, there is significant variability between municipalities, with Wood Buffalo having preserved 98.6 per cent of its assets’ original value, and Crowsnest Pass with 43.9 per cent. In both provinces, the older the municipality and the weaker its fiscal capacity, the lower the net book value of its capital assets. While an ongoing nation-wide shift to modified accrual accounting has ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Almos T. Tassonyi
Brian W. Conger
spellingShingle Almos T. Tassonyi
Brian W. Conger
An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure
author_facet Almos T. Tassonyi
Brian W. Conger
author_sort Almos T. Tassonyi
title An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure
title_short An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure
title_full An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure
title_fullStr An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure
title_full_unstemmed An Exploration into the Municipal Capacity to Finance Capital Infrastructure
title_sort exploration into the municipal capacity to finance capital infrastructure
url http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/municipal-capital-infrastructure-tassonyi-conger.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-112.007,-112.007,57.664,57.664)
ENVELOPE(68.885,68.885,-49.325,-49.325)
ENVELOPE(-55.865,-55.865,52.733,52.733)
geographic Wood Buffalo
Thunder Bay
Crowsnest
geographic_facet Wood Buffalo
Thunder Bay
Crowsnest
genre Wood Buffalo
genre_facet Wood Buffalo
op_relation http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/municipal-capital-infrastructure-tassonyi-conger.pdf
_version_ 1796299189340078080