Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy

Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elinor Sloan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/something-has-give-sloan.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:clh:resear:v:7:y:2014:i:33a
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:clh:resear:v:7:y:2014:i:33a 2024-04-14T08:08:33+00:00 Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy Elinor Sloan http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/something-has-give-sloan.pdf unknown http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/something-has-give-sloan.pdf article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:40:02Z Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment. A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic Canada
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment. A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Elinor Sloan
spellingShingle Elinor Sloan
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
author_facet Elinor Sloan
author_sort Elinor Sloan
title Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_short Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_full Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_fullStr Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_sort something has to give: why delays are the new reality of canada’s defence procurement strategy
url http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/something-has-give-sloan.pdf
geographic Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/something-has-give-sloan.pdf
_version_ 1796305982696980480