Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration

Arctic oil extraction is inconsistent with the 2°C target. We study unilateral strategies by climate-concerned Arctic countries to deter extraction by others. Contradicting common theoretical assumptions about climate-change mitigation, our setting is one where countries may fundamentally disagree a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin Leroux, Daniel Spiro
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2018s-26.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:cir:cirwor:2018s-26
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:cir:cirwor:2018s-26 2024-04-14T08:06:07+00:00 Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration Justin Leroux Daniel Spiro https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2018s-26.pdf unknown https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2018s-26.pdf preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:29:31Z Arctic oil extraction is inconsistent with the 2°C target. We study unilateral strategies by climate-concerned Arctic countries to deter extraction by others. Contradicting common theoretical assumptions about climate-change mitigation, our setting is one where countries may fundamentally disagree about whether mitigation by others is beneficial. This is because Arctic oil extraction requires specific R&D, hence entry by one country expands the extraction-technology market, decreasing costs for others. This means that, on the one hand, countries that extract Arctic oil gain if others do so as well. On the other hand, as countries may disagree about how harmful climate change is, they may disagree whether an equilibrium where all enter is better or worse than an equilibrium where all stay out. Less environmentally-concerned countries (preferring maximum entry) have a first-mover advantage but, because they rely on entry by others, entry in equilibrium is determined by the preferences of those who are moderately concerned about the environment. Furthermore, using a pooling strategy, an environmentally-concerned country can deter entry by credibly “pretending” to be environmentally adamant, and thus be expected to not follow. A rough calibration, suggests a country like Norway, or prospects of a green future U.S. administration, could be pivotal in determining whether the Arctic will be explored. This Working Paper was published in Resource and Energy Economics. Read the article on Resource and Energy Economics website Ce cahier scientifique CIRANO est maintenant publié dans la revue Resource and Energy Economics. Consulter l'article sur le site de la revue Resource and Energy Economics Arctic Region,Oil Exploration,Climate Change,Geopolitics,Unilateral Action Report Arctic Climate change RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Arctic Norway
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Arctic oil extraction is inconsistent with the 2°C target. We study unilateral strategies by climate-concerned Arctic countries to deter extraction by others. Contradicting common theoretical assumptions about climate-change mitigation, our setting is one where countries may fundamentally disagree about whether mitigation by others is beneficial. This is because Arctic oil extraction requires specific R&D, hence entry by one country expands the extraction-technology market, decreasing costs for others. This means that, on the one hand, countries that extract Arctic oil gain if others do so as well. On the other hand, as countries may disagree about how harmful climate change is, they may disagree whether an equilibrium where all enter is better or worse than an equilibrium where all stay out. Less environmentally-concerned countries (preferring maximum entry) have a first-mover advantage but, because they rely on entry by others, entry in equilibrium is determined by the preferences of those who are moderately concerned about the environment. Furthermore, using a pooling strategy, an environmentally-concerned country can deter entry by credibly “pretending” to be environmentally adamant, and thus be expected to not follow. A rough calibration, suggests a country like Norway, or prospects of a green future U.S. administration, could be pivotal in determining whether the Arctic will be explored. This Working Paper was published in Resource and Energy Economics. Read the article on Resource and Energy Economics website Ce cahier scientifique CIRANO est maintenant publié dans la revue Resource and Energy Economics. Consulter l'article sur le site de la revue Resource and Energy Economics Arctic Region,Oil Exploration,Climate Change,Geopolitics,Unilateral Action
format Report
author Justin Leroux
Daniel Spiro
spellingShingle Justin Leroux
Daniel Spiro
Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration
author_facet Justin Leroux
Daniel Spiro
author_sort Justin Leroux
title Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration
title_short Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration
title_full Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration
title_fullStr Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration
title_full_unstemmed Leading the Unwilling: Unilateral Strategies to Prevent Arctic Oil Exploration
title_sort leading the unwilling: unilateral strategies to prevent arctic oil exploration
url https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2018s-26.pdf
geographic Arctic
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_relation https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2018s-26.pdf
_version_ 1796302769870602240