Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland

To understand Iceland’s political situation, it is necessary to consider the historical background to the post-crash constitutional revision process launched in 2009. Also, the paper offers a brief account of some aspects of the constitution-making process during 2010-2013, including the work of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thorvaldur Gylfason
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6018.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6018
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6018 2024-04-14T08:13:31+00:00 Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland Thorvaldur Gylfason https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6018.pdf unknown https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6018.pdf preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:34:09Z To understand Iceland’s political situation, it is necessary to consider the historical background to the post-crash constitutional revision process launched in 2009. Also, the paper offers a brief account of some aspects of the constitution-making process during 2010-2013, including the work of the Constituent Assembly. Further, the paper describes Parliament’s ongoing attempt to undermine the substance of the constitutional bill accepted by two thirds of the voters in the 2012 referendum. A national parliament cannot, without undermining its own legitimacy, allow the results of a constitutional referendum to be changed after the fact, let alone ignored, even if the referendum was advisory. legitimacy, democracy, constitutions, Iceland Report Iceland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description To understand Iceland’s political situation, it is necessary to consider the historical background to the post-crash constitutional revision process launched in 2009. Also, the paper offers a brief account of some aspects of the constitution-making process during 2010-2013, including the work of the Constituent Assembly. Further, the paper describes Parliament’s ongoing attempt to undermine the substance of the constitutional bill accepted by two thirds of the voters in the 2012 referendum. A national parliament cannot, without undermining its own legitimacy, allow the results of a constitutional referendum to be changed after the fact, let alone ignored, even if the referendum was advisory. legitimacy, democracy, constitutions, Iceland
format Report
author Thorvaldur Gylfason
spellingShingle Thorvaldur Gylfason
Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland
author_facet Thorvaldur Gylfason
author_sort Thorvaldur Gylfason
title Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland
title_short Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland
title_full Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland
title_fullStr Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Chain of Legitimacy: Constitution Making in Iceland
title_sort chain of legitimacy: constitution making in iceland
url https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6018.pdf
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6018.pdf
_version_ 1796311508927381504