Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator
Over the years, many voices in the securities industry, with the support of politicians and academics, have advocated for a single national regulator that would discharge pan-Canadian capital-market oversight more effectively and more efficiently than the prevailing system of multiple provincial reg...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_489.pdf |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:cdh:commen:489 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:cdh:commen:489 2024-04-14T08:21:01+00:00 Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator Harvey Naglie https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_489.pdf unknown https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_489.pdf article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:41:25Z Over the years, many voices in the securities industry, with the support of politicians and academics, have advocated for a single national regulator that would discharge pan-Canadian capital-market oversight more effectively and more efficiently than the prevailing system of multiple provincial regulators. This assertion rests, not unreasonably, on the proposition that a single national regulator administering a single securities statute and operating with a single fee schedule would eliminate the duplication, delays and diseconomies inherent in a system consisting of 13 regulators, 13 securities acts and 13 fee schedules. Nevertheless, repeated efforts over the years to establish a national securities regulator have all failed; according to some, however, this may be about to change. The federal government, together with five provinces (Ontario, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick) and one territory (Yukon) are currently developing and planning to launch, before the end of next year, a new securities regulator. According to the participating jurisdictions, this new regulator, the Capital Markets Regulatory Authority (CMRA), will streamline Canada’s capital markets regulatory framework to better protect investors, foster more efficient capital markets and manage systemic risk. As a result, the Canadian public expects that the CMRA, once launched, will feature many of the attributes and offer many of the benefits that have typically been associated with a single national regulator. Unfortunately, these expectations are destined to be disappointed, if not betrayed, because the CMRA in its current form is not, and will not be able to operate as, a single national regulator. While it is true that the original objective of this most recent securities regulatory reform initiative was the creation of a single national regulator, a combination of constitutional imperatives and political choices precluded that outcome. As a consequence, the CMRA is a significantly compromised Plan B ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Prince Edward Island Yukon RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Yukon |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
Over the years, many voices in the securities industry, with the support of politicians and academics, have advocated for a single national regulator that would discharge pan-Canadian capital-market oversight more effectively and more efficiently than the prevailing system of multiple provincial regulators. This assertion rests, not unreasonably, on the proposition that a single national regulator administering a single securities statute and operating with a single fee schedule would eliminate the duplication, delays and diseconomies inherent in a system consisting of 13 regulators, 13 securities acts and 13 fee schedules. Nevertheless, repeated efforts over the years to establish a national securities regulator have all failed; according to some, however, this may be about to change. The federal government, together with five provinces (Ontario, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick) and one territory (Yukon) are currently developing and planning to launch, before the end of next year, a new securities regulator. According to the participating jurisdictions, this new regulator, the Capital Markets Regulatory Authority (CMRA), will streamline Canada’s capital markets regulatory framework to better protect investors, foster more efficient capital markets and manage systemic risk. As a result, the Canadian public expects that the CMRA, once launched, will feature many of the attributes and offer many of the benefits that have typically been associated with a single national regulator. Unfortunately, these expectations are destined to be disappointed, if not betrayed, because the CMRA in its current form is not, and will not be able to operate as, a single national regulator. While it is true that the original objective of this most recent securities regulatory reform initiative was the creation of a single national regulator, a combination of constitutional imperatives and political choices precluded that outcome. As a consequence, the CMRA is a significantly compromised Plan B ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Harvey Naglie |
spellingShingle |
Harvey Naglie Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator |
author_facet |
Harvey Naglie |
author_sort |
Harvey Naglie |
title |
Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator |
title_short |
Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator |
title_full |
Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator |
title_fullStr |
Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator |
title_full_unstemmed |
Not Ready for Prime Time: Canada’s Proposed New Securities Regulator |
title_sort |
not ready for prime time: canada’s proposed new securities regulator |
url |
https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_489.pdf |
geographic |
Yukon |
geographic_facet |
Yukon |
genre |
Prince Edward Island Yukon |
genre_facet |
Prince Edward Island Yukon |
op_relation |
https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_489.pdf |
_version_ |
1796299438933671936 |