Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes

From coast to coast, non-renewable-resource taxation is a key source of provincial government revenue – and political rancour. Alberta has recently started a comprehensive review of its oil and natural gas extraction tax system. Newfoundland and Labrador is looking at a redesign of its royalty syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Dachis, Robin W. Boadway
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/drilling-down-royalties-how-canadian-provinces-can-improve-non-renewable-resource-taxes
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:cdh:commen:435
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:cdh:commen:435 2024-04-14T08:15:07+00:00 Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes Benjamin Dachis Robin W. Boadway https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/drilling-down-royalties-how-canadian-provinces-can-improve-non-renewable-resource-taxes unknown https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/drilling-down-royalties-how-canadian-provinces-can-improve-non-renewable-resource-taxes article ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:40:33Z From coast to coast, non-renewable-resource taxation is a key source of provincial government revenue – and political rancour. Alberta has recently started a comprehensive review of its oil and natural gas extraction tax system. Newfoundland and Labrador is looking at a redesign of its royalty system. And British Columbia has set up a new tax on liquefied natural gas production. These provinces can all improve their current resource tax systems to raise more money without jeopardizing investment. The key problem with current resource taxes in Canada is not the tax rates, but the design of the taxes. Canadian policymakers should be looking at international best practices in resource tax design. Australia and Norway have best-in-class resource taxes that are based on the cash flows of resource production. That better design means that resource companies in those countries pay a high tax rate on cash flows but still have a strong incentive to invest. Western Canadian provinces instead rely on economically distorting gross-revenue royalties for most onshore oil and gas taxation. These provinces should change their gross-revenue royalties to more efficient cash-flow taxes. Cash-flow taxes are a better way of reflecting the cumulative costs that resource companies face to extract energy than are gross revenue royalties. Although Alberta’s oil sands cash-flow tax and Newfoundland and Labrador’s offshore royalty follow many international best practices, both have room for improvement. Those provinces should rethink the rules around how companies pre-pay gross revenue royalties, the limits on the kinds of expenses companies can deduct, and having a royalty rate that fluctuates with oil prices. British Columbia’s mining tax hits many of the right notes. However, the province’s tax on liquefied natural gas exports would be unnecessary if it changed its gross-revenue royalties on natural gas extraction to cash-flow taxes. Likewise, the federal government should consider reforms to its own corporate income tax system to tax ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Newfoundland Canada Norway British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description From coast to coast, non-renewable-resource taxation is a key source of provincial government revenue – and political rancour. Alberta has recently started a comprehensive review of its oil and natural gas extraction tax system. Newfoundland and Labrador is looking at a redesign of its royalty system. And British Columbia has set up a new tax on liquefied natural gas production. These provinces can all improve their current resource tax systems to raise more money without jeopardizing investment. The key problem with current resource taxes in Canada is not the tax rates, but the design of the taxes. Canadian policymakers should be looking at international best practices in resource tax design. Australia and Norway have best-in-class resource taxes that are based on the cash flows of resource production. That better design means that resource companies in those countries pay a high tax rate on cash flows but still have a strong incentive to invest. Western Canadian provinces instead rely on economically distorting gross-revenue royalties for most onshore oil and gas taxation. These provinces should change their gross-revenue royalties to more efficient cash-flow taxes. Cash-flow taxes are a better way of reflecting the cumulative costs that resource companies face to extract energy than are gross revenue royalties. Although Alberta’s oil sands cash-flow tax and Newfoundland and Labrador’s offshore royalty follow many international best practices, both have room for improvement. Those provinces should rethink the rules around how companies pre-pay gross revenue royalties, the limits on the kinds of expenses companies can deduct, and having a royalty rate that fluctuates with oil prices. British Columbia’s mining tax hits many of the right notes. However, the province’s tax on liquefied natural gas exports would be unnecessary if it changed its gross-revenue royalties on natural gas extraction to cash-flow taxes. Likewise, the federal government should consider reforms to its own corporate income tax system to tax ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Benjamin Dachis
Robin W. Boadway
spellingShingle Benjamin Dachis
Robin W. Boadway
Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes
author_facet Benjamin Dachis
Robin W. Boadway
author_sort Benjamin Dachis
title Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes
title_short Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes
title_full Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes
title_fullStr Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes
title_full_unstemmed Drilling Down on Royalties: How Canadian Provinces Can Improve Non-Renewable Resource Taxes
title_sort drilling down on royalties: how canadian provinces can improve non-renewable resource taxes
url https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/drilling-down-royalties-how-canadian-provinces-can-improve-non-renewable-resource-taxes
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic Newfoundland
Canada
Norway
British Columbia
geographic_facet Newfoundland
Canada
Norway
British Columbia
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_relation https://www.cdhowe.org/public-policy-research/drilling-down-royalties-how-canadian-provinces-can-improve-non-renewable-resource-taxes
_version_ 1796313380610375680