Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data

There have been numerous historical claims by First Nations across Canada for damages resulting from the taking of land and the resulting loss of use of such land. Many of these cases have come before the courts. Generally in such cases, there is agreement that either the Federal Government and/or a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis
Main Authors: Lazar Fred, Prisman Eliezer Z
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0007
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:8:n:1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bpj:jbvela:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:8:n:1 2024-04-14T08:11:43+00:00 Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data Lazar Fred Prisman Eliezer Z https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0007 unknown https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0007 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0007 2024-03-19T10:41:03Z There have been numerous historical claims by First Nations across Canada for damages resulting from the taking of land and the resulting loss of use of such land. Many of these cases have come before the courts. Generally in such cases, there is agreement that either the Federal Government and/or a provincial government has not fulfilled its fiduciary duty. Hence, the disputes before the courts usually pertain to valuing the losses of the First Nation(s) who is (are) the Plaintiff(s) in these cases. Since the original taking of the lands occurred many decades in the past, the court is challenged with difficult valuation issues, which are complicated by a lack of historical data and transaction records. Hence, even if the parties agree on the methodology for valuing the losses and on an annual lease rate, they still need to determine the annual price of the land. A common practice for generating a price trajectory for the land is to use a very small sample of land prices, and interpolate between these prices to estimate the intervening land prices. This practice does not generate the expected trajectory given the known observations. It implicitly assumes a deterministic price process with an annual fixed appreciation of the asset throughout the period. These assumptions are inconsistent both with realistic price movements and the literature modeling asset price processes. Consequently this practice can, and mostly does, generate a very significant bias in the value of the loss. This paper suggests a loss of use valuation method that is based on a land price process consistent with the literature modeling asset price processes. land loss of use, Brownian Bridge, asset price trajectories Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Canada Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis 13 1
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description There have been numerous historical claims by First Nations across Canada for damages resulting from the taking of land and the resulting loss of use of such land. Many of these cases have come before the courts. Generally in such cases, there is agreement that either the Federal Government and/or a provincial government has not fulfilled its fiduciary duty. Hence, the disputes before the courts usually pertain to valuing the losses of the First Nation(s) who is (are) the Plaintiff(s) in these cases. Since the original taking of the lands occurred many decades in the past, the court is challenged with difficult valuation issues, which are complicated by a lack of historical data and transaction records. Hence, even if the parties agree on the methodology for valuing the losses and on an annual lease rate, they still need to determine the annual price of the land. A common practice for generating a price trajectory for the land is to use a very small sample of land prices, and interpolate between these prices to estimate the intervening land prices. This practice does not generate the expected trajectory given the known observations. It implicitly assumes a deterministic price process with an annual fixed appreciation of the asset throughout the period. These assumptions are inconsistent both with realistic price movements and the literature modeling asset price processes. Consequently this practice can, and mostly does, generate a very significant bias in the value of the loss. This paper suggests a loss of use valuation method that is based on a land price process consistent with the literature modeling asset price processes. land loss of use, Brownian Bridge, asset price trajectories
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lazar Fred
Prisman Eliezer Z
spellingShingle Lazar Fred
Prisman Eliezer Z
Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data
author_facet Lazar Fred
Prisman Eliezer Z
author_sort Lazar Fred
title Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data
title_short Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data
title_full Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data
title_fullStr Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data
title_full_unstemmed Valuing Historical Claims of Loss of Use of Land with Sparse Data
title_sort valuing historical claims of loss of use of land with sparse data
url https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0007
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0007
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2017-0007
container_title Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis
container_volume 13
container_issue 1
_version_ 1796309444197351424