Differential urbanisation in Finland
The purpose of this paper is to examine the process of urbanisation in Finland over a long time span 1941–98 in the light of the theoretical model of differential urbanisation, at the same time testing the applicability of the latter to the Finnish situation. Urbanisation began in Finland relatively...
Published in: | Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 |
id |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:94:y:2003:i:1:p:49-63 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:94:y:2003:i:1:p:49-63 2024-04-14T08:16:34+00:00 Differential urbanisation in Finland Elli Heikkilä https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 unknown https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 2024-03-19T10:31:32Z The purpose of this paper is to examine the process of urbanisation in Finland over a long time span 1941–98 in the light of the theoretical model of differential urbanisation, at the same time testing the applicability of the latter to the Finnish situation. Urbanisation began in Finland relatively late by comparison with other European countries, but the process has taken place all the more rapidly. Urbanisation started out from large cities, and in the case of the capital, Helsinki, the early primate city stage began before 1940. Features of the stages outlined in the model are identifiable in the process of urbanisation as it has taken place in Finland. The urban system in Finland progressed in the mid 1970s to the small–sized city stage, when polarisation reversal came to an end and counter–urbanisation set in. The net migration balance of cities and towns became negative in 1977, i.e. they began to lose population to rural communes. This was the first real period of the clean break and it continued to the 1980s. In 1980 the net migration balance for large cities was positive but it changed back to negative in the beginning of the 1980s. Population concentration in the few large cities in Finland started again in the 1990s. Spatial differences in urbanisation are also observable at the local level which have been exemplified by the province of Uusimaa in Southern Finland, regional analyses for Southern and Southeastern Finland and Kainuu county in Northern Finland. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Finland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Kainuu ENVELOPE(28.000,28.000,66.000,66.000) Uusimaa ENVELOPE(24.071,24.071,66.248,66.248) Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 94 1 49 63 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) |
op_collection_id |
ftrepec |
language |
unknown |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to examine the process of urbanisation in Finland over a long time span 1941–98 in the light of the theoretical model of differential urbanisation, at the same time testing the applicability of the latter to the Finnish situation. Urbanisation began in Finland relatively late by comparison with other European countries, but the process has taken place all the more rapidly. Urbanisation started out from large cities, and in the case of the capital, Helsinki, the early primate city stage began before 1940. Features of the stages outlined in the model are identifiable in the process of urbanisation as it has taken place in Finland. The urban system in Finland progressed in the mid 1970s to the small–sized city stage, when polarisation reversal came to an end and counter–urbanisation set in. The net migration balance of cities and towns became negative in 1977, i.e. they began to lose population to rural communes. This was the first real period of the clean break and it continued to the 1980s. In 1980 the net migration balance for large cities was positive but it changed back to negative in the beginning of the 1980s. Population concentration in the few large cities in Finland started again in the 1990s. Spatial differences in urbanisation are also observable at the local level which have been exemplified by the province of Uusimaa in Southern Finland, regional analyses for Southern and Southeastern Finland and Kainuu county in Northern Finland. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Elli Heikkilä |
spellingShingle |
Elli Heikkilä Differential urbanisation in Finland |
author_facet |
Elli Heikkilä |
author_sort |
Elli Heikkilä |
title |
Differential urbanisation in Finland |
title_short |
Differential urbanisation in Finland |
title_full |
Differential urbanisation in Finland |
title_fullStr |
Differential urbanisation in Finland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differential urbanisation in Finland |
title_sort |
differential urbanisation in finland |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(28.000,28.000,66.000,66.000) ENVELOPE(24.071,24.071,66.248,66.248) |
geographic |
Kainuu Uusimaa |
geographic_facet |
Kainuu Uusimaa |
genre |
Northern Finland |
genre_facet |
Northern Finland |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00236 |
container_title |
Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie |
container_volume |
94 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
49 |
op_container_end_page |
63 |
_version_ |
1796315270888816640 |