Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density

Sightings of previously marked animals can extend a capture–recapture dataset without the added cost of capturing new animals for marking. Combined marking and resighting methods are therefore an attractive option in animal population studies, and there exist various likelihood†based non†spati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biometrics
Main Authors: Murray G. Efford, Christine M. Hunter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12766
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:2:p:411-420
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:2:p:411-420 2024-04-14T08:18:43+00:00 Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density Murray G. Efford Christine M. Hunter https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12766 unknown https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12766 article ftrepec https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12766 2024-03-19T10:25:09Z Sightings of previously marked animals can extend a capture–recapture dataset without the added cost of capturing new animals for marking. Combined marking and resighting methods are therefore an attractive option in animal population studies, and there exist various likelihood†based non†spatial models, and some spatial versions fitted by Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. As implemented to date, the focus has been on modeling sightings only, which requires that the spatial distribution of pre†marked animals is known. We develop a suite of likelihood†based spatial mark–resight models that either include the marking phase (“capture–mark–resight†models) or require a known distribution of marked animals (narrow†sense “mark–resight†). The new models sacrifice some information in the covariance structure of the counts of unmarked animals; estimation is by maximizing a pseudolikelihood with a simulation†based adjustment for overdispersion in the sightings of unmarked animals. Simulations suggest that the resulting estimates of population density have low bias and adequate confidence interval coverage under typical sampling conditions. Further work is needed to specify the conditions under which ignoring covariance results in unacceptable loss of precision, or to modify the pseudolikelihood to include that information. The methods are applied to a study of ship rats Rattus rattus using live traps and video cameras in a New Zealand forest, and to previously published data. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rattus rattus RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) New Zealand Biometrics 74 2 411 420
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Sightings of previously marked animals can extend a capture–recapture dataset without the added cost of capturing new animals for marking. Combined marking and resighting methods are therefore an attractive option in animal population studies, and there exist various likelihood†based non†spatial models, and some spatial versions fitted by Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. As implemented to date, the focus has been on modeling sightings only, which requires that the spatial distribution of pre†marked animals is known. We develop a suite of likelihood†based spatial mark–resight models that either include the marking phase (“capture–mark–resight†models) or require a known distribution of marked animals (narrow†sense “mark–resight†). The new models sacrifice some information in the covariance structure of the counts of unmarked animals; estimation is by maximizing a pseudolikelihood with a simulation†based adjustment for overdispersion in the sightings of unmarked animals. Simulations suggest that the resulting estimates of population density have low bias and adequate confidence interval coverage under typical sampling conditions. Further work is needed to specify the conditions under which ignoring covariance results in unacceptable loss of precision, or to modify the pseudolikelihood to include that information. The methods are applied to a study of ship rats Rattus rattus using live traps and video cameras in a New Zealand forest, and to previously published data.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Murray G. Efford
Christine M. Hunter
spellingShingle Murray G. Efford
Christine M. Hunter
Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density
author_facet Murray G. Efford
Christine M. Hunter
author_sort Murray G. Efford
title Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density
title_short Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density
title_full Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density
title_fullStr Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density
title_full_unstemmed Spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density
title_sort spatial capture–mark–resight estimation of animal population density
url https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12766
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12766
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12766
container_title Biometrics
container_volume 74
container_issue 2
container_start_page 411
op_container_end_page 420
_version_ 1796318254445101056