Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies

The causal effect of a treatment on an outcome is generally mediated by several intermediate variables. Estimation of the component of the causal effect of a treatment that is mediated by a given intermediate variable (the indirect effect of the treatment), and the component that is not mediated by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark van der Laan, Maya Petersen
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1155&context=ucbbiostat
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bep:ucbbio:1155
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:bep:ucbbio:1155 2024-04-14T08:12:22+00:00 Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies Mark van der Laan Maya Petersen http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1155&context=ucbbiostat unknown http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1155&context=ucbbiostat preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:35:06Z The causal effect of a treatment on an outcome is generally mediated by several intermediate variables. Estimation of the component of the causal effect of a treatment that is mediated by a given intermediate variable (the indirect effect of the treatment), and the component that is not mediated by that intermediate variable (the direct effect of the treatment) is often relevant to mechanistic understanding and to the design of clinical and public health interventions. Under the assumption of no-unmeasured confounders, Robins & Greenland (1992) and Pearl (2000), develop two identifiability results for direct and indirect causal effects. They define an individual direct effect as the counterfactual effect of a treatment on an outcome when the intermediate variable is set at the value it would have had if the individual had not been treated, and the population direct effect as the mean of these individual counterfactual direct effects. The identifiability result developed by Robins & Greenland (1992) relies on an additional ``No-Interaction Assumption'', while the identifiability result developed by Pearl (2000) relies on a particular assumption about conditional independence in the population being sampled. Both assumptions are considered very restrictive. As a result, estimation of direct and indirect effects has been considered infeasible in many settings. We show that the identifiability result of Pearl (2000), also holds under a new conditional independence assumption which states that, within strata of baseline covariates, the individual direct effect at a fixed level of the intermediate variable is independent of the no-treatment counterfactual intermediate variable. We argue that our assumption is typically less restrictive than both the assumption of Pearl (2000), and the ``No-interaction Assumption'' of Robins & Greenland (1992). We also generalize the current definition of the direct (and indirect) effect of a treatment as the population mean of individual counterfactual direct (and ... Report Greenland RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description The causal effect of a treatment on an outcome is generally mediated by several intermediate variables. Estimation of the component of the causal effect of a treatment that is mediated by a given intermediate variable (the indirect effect of the treatment), and the component that is not mediated by that intermediate variable (the direct effect of the treatment) is often relevant to mechanistic understanding and to the design of clinical and public health interventions. Under the assumption of no-unmeasured confounders, Robins & Greenland (1992) and Pearl (2000), develop two identifiability results for direct and indirect causal effects. They define an individual direct effect as the counterfactual effect of a treatment on an outcome when the intermediate variable is set at the value it would have had if the individual had not been treated, and the population direct effect as the mean of these individual counterfactual direct effects. The identifiability result developed by Robins & Greenland (1992) relies on an additional ``No-Interaction Assumption'', while the identifiability result developed by Pearl (2000) relies on a particular assumption about conditional independence in the population being sampled. Both assumptions are considered very restrictive. As a result, estimation of direct and indirect effects has been considered infeasible in many settings. We show that the identifiability result of Pearl (2000), also holds under a new conditional independence assumption which states that, within strata of baseline covariates, the individual direct effect at a fixed level of the intermediate variable is independent of the no-treatment counterfactual intermediate variable. We argue that our assumption is typically less restrictive than both the assumption of Pearl (2000), and the ``No-interaction Assumption'' of Robins & Greenland (1992). We also generalize the current definition of the direct (and indirect) effect of a treatment as the population mean of individual counterfactual direct (and ...
format Report
author Mark van der Laan
Maya Petersen
spellingShingle Mark van der Laan
Maya Petersen
Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies
author_facet Mark van der Laan
Maya Petersen
author_sort Mark van der Laan
title Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies
title_short Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies
title_full Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies
title_fullStr Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Direct and Indirect Causal Effects in Longitudinal Studies
title_sort estimation of direct and indirect causal effects in longitudinal studies
url http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1155&context=ucbbiostat
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1155&context=ucbbiostat
_version_ 1796310160300310528