Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results

Climate feedback mechanisms that have the potential to intensify global warming have been omitted almost completely in the integrated assessment of climate change and the economy so far. With the present paper we try to narrow this gap in literature. We discuss different types of feedback mechanisms...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heiko Wirths, Joachim Rathmann, Peter Michaelis
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vwl.wiwi.uni-augsburg.de/vwl/institut/paper/327.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:aug:augsbe:0327
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:aug:augsbe:0327 2024-04-14T08:18:13+00:00 Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results Heiko Wirths Joachim Rathmann Peter Michaelis https://vwl.wiwi.uni-augsburg.de/vwl/institut/paper/327.pdf unknown https://vwl.wiwi.uni-augsburg.de/vwl/institut/paper/327.pdf preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:28:19Z Climate feedback mechanisms that have the potential to intensify global warming have been omitted almost completely in the integrated assessment of climate change and the economy so far. With the present paper we try to narrow this gap in literature. We discuss different types of feedback mechanisms and show how to incorporate them into the mathematical setup of the well-known integrated assessment model DICE-2013R. Subsequently, we choose the permafrost carbon feedback (PCF) as specific application for an empirical analysis. We calibrate the parameters for our modified version of the DICE-2013R model and compute the optimal emission mitigation rates that maximize welfare accounting for the impact of the PCF. Finally, we quantify the economic losses resulting from a mitigation policy which ignores this feedback mechanism. Our empirical results generally indicate that accounting for the PCF leads to an increase in the optimal mitigation rates. integrated assessment, DICE model, climate feedbacks, permafrost Report permafrost RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Climate feedback mechanisms that have the potential to intensify global warming have been omitted almost completely in the integrated assessment of climate change and the economy so far. With the present paper we try to narrow this gap in literature. We discuss different types of feedback mechanisms and show how to incorporate them into the mathematical setup of the well-known integrated assessment model DICE-2013R. Subsequently, we choose the permafrost carbon feedback (PCF) as specific application for an empirical analysis. We calibrate the parameters for our modified version of the DICE-2013R model and compute the optimal emission mitigation rates that maximize welfare accounting for the impact of the PCF. Finally, we quantify the economic losses resulting from a mitigation policy which ignores this feedback mechanism. Our empirical results generally indicate that accounting for the PCF leads to an increase in the optimal mitigation rates. integrated assessment, DICE model, climate feedbacks, permafrost
format Report
author Heiko Wirths
Joachim Rathmann
Peter Michaelis
spellingShingle Heiko Wirths
Joachim Rathmann
Peter Michaelis
Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results
author_facet Heiko Wirths
Joachim Rathmann
Peter Michaelis
author_sort Heiko Wirths
title Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results
title_short Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results
title_full Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results
title_fullStr Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results
title_full_unstemmed Climate Feedbacks in DICE-2013R - Modeling and Empirical Results
title_sort climate feedbacks in dice-2013r - modeling and empirical results
url https://vwl.wiwi.uni-augsburg.de/vwl/institut/paper/327.pdf
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_relation https://vwl.wiwi.uni-augsburg.de/vwl/institut/paper/327.pdf
_version_ 1796317660837838848