Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities?

Forest-dependent, rural communities often experience declining populations and prosperity because technological changes related to harvesting, transportation and processing of wood fiber occur more rapidly than technical improvements in fiber availability – in forest growth. How then can communities...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: van Kooten, G. Cornelis
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf?subformat=pdfa
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ags:uvicwp:270681
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ags:uvicwp:270681 2024-04-14T08:11:39+00:00 Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities? van Kooten, G. Cornelis https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf?subformat=pdfa unknown https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf?subformat=pdfa preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:38:37Z Forest-dependent, rural communities often experience declining populations and prosperity because technological changes related to harvesting, transportation and processing of wood fiber occur more rapidly than technical improvements in fiber availability – in forest growth. How then can communities where forest resources are the primary economic driver increase wealth that might then be used for economic development? Answers to this question are explored by examining the potential of different management regimes to create greater employment and wealth, particularly management options that include carbon values. Our application is to an interior forest region of British Columbia, the province where First Nations control the most timber supply and the region that produces the greatest volume and value of lumber for export. We examine the trade-offs between revenue as measured by net present value, employment and carbon in forest ecosystems, where the latter is a proxy for the ecological health of the forest. We conclude from the analysis that no management strategy is able to satisfy all of the technical, environmental and social/cultural constraints and, at the same time, offer forest-based economic development that will prevent the decline of rural communities. Nonetheless, given knowledge of tradeoffs, there are management options that can improve upon current employment, wealth and/or ecological health of the forest. Community/Rural/Urban Development, Resource /Energy Economics and Policy Report First Nations RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description Forest-dependent, rural communities often experience declining populations and prosperity because technological changes related to harvesting, transportation and processing of wood fiber occur more rapidly than technical improvements in fiber availability – in forest growth. How then can communities where forest resources are the primary economic driver increase wealth that might then be used for economic development? Answers to this question are explored by examining the potential of different management regimes to create greater employment and wealth, particularly management options that include carbon values. Our application is to an interior forest region of British Columbia, the province where First Nations control the most timber supply and the region that produces the greatest volume and value of lumber for export. We examine the trade-offs between revenue as measured by net present value, employment and carbon in forest ecosystems, where the latter is a proxy for the ecological health of the forest. We conclude from the analysis that no management strategy is able to satisfy all of the technical, environmental and social/cultural constraints and, at the same time, offer forest-based economic development that will prevent the decline of rural communities. Nonetheless, given knowledge of tradeoffs, there are management options that can improve upon current employment, wealth and/or ecological health of the forest. Community/Rural/Urban Development, Resource /Energy Economics and Policy
format Report
author van Kooten, G. Cornelis
spellingShingle van Kooten, G. Cornelis
Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities?
author_facet van Kooten, G. Cornelis
author_sort van Kooten, G. Cornelis
title Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities?
title_short Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities?
title_full Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities?
title_fullStr Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities?
title_full_unstemmed Can Carbon Offset Trading Promote Economic Development in Forest-Dependent and First Nations Communities?
title_sort can carbon offset trading promote economic development in forest-dependent and first nations communities?
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf?subformat=pdfa
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270681/files/WorkingPaper2018-02.pdf?subformat=pdfa
_version_ 1796309361588436992