Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment

An agreement between Norway and the European Commission specifies an increase in the export tax on Norwegian salmon entering EU markets from 0.75% to 3.00% effective 1 July 1997. Further, Norway's exports are subject to a price floor and quantity ceiling, neither of which were binding over the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kinnucan, Henry W., Myrland, Oystein
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24826/files/cp02ki10.pdf
id ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ags:eaae02:24826
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrepec:oai:RePEc:ags:eaae02:24826 2024-04-14T08:09:14+00:00 Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment Kinnucan, Henry W. Myrland, Oystein https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24826/files/cp02ki10.pdf unknown https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24826/files/cp02ki10.pdf preprint ftrepec 2024-03-19T10:38:35Z An agreement between Norway and the European Commission specifies an increase in the export tax on Norwegian salmon entering EU markets from 0.75% to 3.00% effective 1 July 1997. Further, Norway's exports are subject to a price floor and quantity ceiling, neither of which were binding over the evaluation period. Since the tax's proceeds are to be used by Norway to fund generic marketing of Atlantic salmon, it is possible that the agreement is winwin, i.e., benefits United Kingdom and Norwegian producers alike. To test this, we use an equilibrium displacement model to estimate the agreement's effects on prices, trade flows, and producer welfare. Results based on data through 1999 suggest the agreement is indeed win-win, but that currency realignments and feed quota policy can easily neutralize or obscure the effects. International Relations/Trade Report Atlantic salmon RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) Norway
institution Open Polar
collection RePEc (Research Papers in Economics)
op_collection_id ftrepec
language unknown
description An agreement between Norway and the European Commission specifies an increase in the export tax on Norwegian salmon entering EU markets from 0.75% to 3.00% effective 1 July 1997. Further, Norway's exports are subject to a price floor and quantity ceiling, neither of which were binding over the evaluation period. Since the tax's proceeds are to be used by Norway to fund generic marketing of Atlantic salmon, it is possible that the agreement is winwin, i.e., benefits United Kingdom and Norwegian producers alike. To test this, we use an equilibrium displacement model to estimate the agreement's effects on prices, trade flows, and producer welfare. Results based on data through 1999 suggest the agreement is indeed win-win, but that currency realignments and feed quota policy can easily neutralize or obscure the effects. International Relations/Trade
format Report
author Kinnucan, Henry W.
Myrland, Oystein
spellingShingle Kinnucan, Henry W.
Myrland, Oystein
Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment
author_facet Kinnucan, Henry W.
Myrland, Oystein
author_sort Kinnucan, Henry W.
title Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment
title_short Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment
title_full Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment
title_fullStr Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Relative Impact of the Norway-EU Salmon Agreement: A Midterm Assessment
title_sort relative impact of the norway-eu salmon agreement: a midterm assessment
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24826/files/cp02ki10.pdf
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Atlantic salmon
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
op_relation https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24826/files/cp02ki10.pdf
_version_ 1796306717090250752