A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride

Although anthropogenic fluoride (F−) pollution is a serious worldwide environmental problem, only a few countries have currently established national water quality criteria to protect freshwater biota. In this paper, I carry out a comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Cana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Camargo, Julio
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Limnetica 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/Limnetica/article/view/96628
id ftrecyt:oai:recyt.fecyt.es:article/96628
record_format openpolar
spelling ftrecyt:oai:recyt.fecyt.es:article/96628 2024-06-23T07:51:25+00:00 A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride Camargo, Julio 2024-06-06 application/pdf https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/Limnetica/article/view/96628 eng eng Limnetica https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/Limnetica/article/view/96628/78343 https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/Limnetica/article/view/96628 Derechos de autor 2024 Limnetica Limnetica; Vol. 43 No. 2 (2024): Limnetica; 229-237 Limnetica; Vol. 43 Núm. 2 (2024): Limnetica; 229-237 1989-1806 0213-8409 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2024 ftrecyt 2024-06-11T14:28:39Z Although anthropogenic fluoride (F−) pollution is a serious worldwide environmental problem, only a few countries have currently established national water quality criteria to protect freshwater biota. In this paper, I carry out a comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain. The Canadian water quality benchmark of 0.12 mg F−/l (maximum allowable concentration) prevents Canada’s fresh waters from significant adverse events of fluoride pollution, thereby protecting sensitive native aquatic invertebrates and adult-migrating Pacific salmon. By contrast, the Spanish water quality benchmark of 1.7 mg F−/l (annual mean concentration) allows not only continuous levels of fluoride pollution more than six times higher than natural fluoride concentrations in Spain’s fresh waters, but also much higher intermittent levels of fluoride pollution (> 15 mg F−/l). This unacceptable scenario is contrary to the present environmental aim of zero pollution in the European Union. Consequently, in light of existing toxicological data, I recommend a Spanish water quality benchmark of 0.15−0.25 mg F−/l (maximum allowable concentration) for adequately protecting sensitive native aquatic invertebrates, such as amphipods, caddisflies and crayfish, from anthropogenic fluoride pollution. The recommended water quality guideline for fluoride could also protect adult-migrating Atlantic salmon, and prevent significant fluoride bioaccumulation in tolerant freshwater organisms. Although anthropogenic fluoride (F−) pollution is a serious worldwide environmental problem, only a few countries have currently established national water quality criteria for the protection of freshwater biota. Since Canada is a global leader in biodiversity conservation that exhibits restrictive water quality benchmarks, I carry out a comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain. The Canadian water quality benchmark of 0.12 mg F−/l (maximum allowable concentration) prevents Canada’s fresh ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon RECyT (Repositorio Español de Ciencia y Tecnología) Canada Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection RECyT (Repositorio Español de Ciencia y Tecnología)
op_collection_id ftrecyt
language English
description Although anthropogenic fluoride (F−) pollution is a serious worldwide environmental problem, only a few countries have currently established national water quality criteria to protect freshwater biota. In this paper, I carry out a comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain. The Canadian water quality benchmark of 0.12 mg F−/l (maximum allowable concentration) prevents Canada’s fresh waters from significant adverse events of fluoride pollution, thereby protecting sensitive native aquatic invertebrates and adult-migrating Pacific salmon. By contrast, the Spanish water quality benchmark of 1.7 mg F−/l (annual mean concentration) allows not only continuous levels of fluoride pollution more than six times higher than natural fluoride concentrations in Spain’s fresh waters, but also much higher intermittent levels of fluoride pollution (> 15 mg F−/l). This unacceptable scenario is contrary to the present environmental aim of zero pollution in the European Union. Consequently, in light of existing toxicological data, I recommend a Spanish water quality benchmark of 0.15−0.25 mg F−/l (maximum allowable concentration) for adequately protecting sensitive native aquatic invertebrates, such as amphipods, caddisflies and crayfish, from anthropogenic fluoride pollution. The recommended water quality guideline for fluoride could also protect adult-migrating Atlantic salmon, and prevent significant fluoride bioaccumulation in tolerant freshwater organisms. Although anthropogenic fluoride (F−) pollution is a serious worldwide environmental problem, only a few countries have currently established national water quality criteria for the protection of freshwater biota. Since Canada is a global leader in biodiversity conservation that exhibits restrictive water quality benchmarks, I carry out a comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain. The Canadian water quality benchmark of 0.12 mg F−/l (maximum allowable concentration) prevents Canada’s fresh ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Camargo, Julio
spellingShingle Camargo, Julio
A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride
author_facet Camargo, Julio
author_sort Camargo, Julio
title A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride
title_short A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride
title_full A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in Canada and Spain: Comparing Canadian and Spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride
title_sort comparative analysis of water quality guidelines for fluoride in canada and spain: comparing canadian and spanish water quality guidelines for fluoride
publisher Limnetica
publishDate 2024
url https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/Limnetica/article/view/96628
geographic Canada
Pacific
geographic_facet Canada
Pacific
genre Atlantic salmon
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
op_source Limnetica; Vol. 43 No. 2 (2024): Limnetica; 229-237
Limnetica; Vol. 43 Núm. 2 (2024): Limnetica; 229-237
1989-1806
0213-8409
op_relation https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/Limnetica/article/view/96628/78343
https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/Limnetica/article/view/96628
op_rights Derechos de autor 2024 Limnetica
_version_ 1802642515469271040