Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North

This thesis examines the delimitation of the continental shelves beyond 200 nautical miles (M) in the Arctic Ocean. It analyzes the regimes of the continental shelf and the Arctic, as well as the rules applicable to the delimitation of the continental shelves, to develop the delimitation scenario fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antsygina, Ekaterina
Other Authors: Lamp, Nicolas, Law
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1974/29450
id ftqueensuniv:oai:qspace.library.queensu.ca:1974/29450
record_format openpolar
spelling ftqueensuniv:oai:qspace.library.queensu.ca:1974/29450 2023-05-15T14:36:25+02:00 Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North Antsygina, Ekaterina Lamp, Nicolas Law 2021-09-29T17:38:48Z http://hdl.handle.net/1974/29450 eng eng Canadian theses http://hdl.handle.net/1974/29450 Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University Copying and Preserving Your Thesis This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner. Arctic Maritime delimitation Extended continental shelf Three-step approach Sector Theory thesis 2021 ftqueensuniv 2021-10-09T23:02:08Z This thesis examines the delimitation of the continental shelves beyond 200 nautical miles (M) in the Arctic Ocean. It analyzes the regimes of the continental shelf and the Arctic, as well as the rules applicable to the delimitation of the continental shelves, to develop the delimitation scenario for the overlapping entitlements of Canada, Denmark, and Russia. Whereas the scope of the research was narrowed down to the Central Arctic Ocean, the outcomes have implications for the more general issue of the delimitation of the extended continental shelves and demonstrate that the existing delimitation methodology of international tribunals needs to be adjusted in cases that exclusively or primarily concern the ECSs. Article 83 of the UNCLOS, which regulates the delimitation of the continental shelves, does not provide for a binding method of delimitation. This means that the concerned Arctic States are free to choose any delimitation method they consider suitable. This thesis applies the three-step approach developed by international tribunals because it incorporates the most popular method of maritime delimitation, equidistance. However, the application of the methodology of international tribunals to the case of the Central Arctic Ocean revealed issues that are unique for the ECSs and demand the adjustment of the method for the identification of the relevant coasts and relevant area in delimitation. Differences between the continental shelves within and beyond 200 M make the application of the three-step approach challenging. The argument that this thesis develops is that the distinctions between the two types of the shelves influence the delimitation, and hence, these distinctions should be considered by States and international tribunals when establishing borders between the continental shelves beyond 200 M. This thesis also considers the interplay between the regimes of the continental shelf and the Arctic and analyzes how the ECSs in the Arctic can be delimited. Whereas this thesis does not provide the ultimate solution for the delimitation of the ECSs in the Central Arctic Ocean, it attempts to analyze what legal and non-legal factors will influence the establishment of the maritime borders between Russia, Denmark, and Canada and suggests a delimitation scenario. PhD Thesis Arctic Arctic Ocean Central Arctic Queen's University, Ontario: QSpace Arctic Arctic Ocean Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Queen's University, Ontario: QSpace
op_collection_id ftqueensuniv
language English
topic Arctic
Maritime delimitation
Extended continental shelf
Three-step approach
Sector Theory
spellingShingle Arctic
Maritime delimitation
Extended continental shelf
Three-step approach
Sector Theory
Antsygina, Ekaterina
Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North
topic_facet Arctic
Maritime delimitation
Extended continental shelf
Three-step approach
Sector Theory
description This thesis examines the delimitation of the continental shelves beyond 200 nautical miles (M) in the Arctic Ocean. It analyzes the regimes of the continental shelf and the Arctic, as well as the rules applicable to the delimitation of the continental shelves, to develop the delimitation scenario for the overlapping entitlements of Canada, Denmark, and Russia. Whereas the scope of the research was narrowed down to the Central Arctic Ocean, the outcomes have implications for the more general issue of the delimitation of the extended continental shelves and demonstrate that the existing delimitation methodology of international tribunals needs to be adjusted in cases that exclusively or primarily concern the ECSs. Article 83 of the UNCLOS, which regulates the delimitation of the continental shelves, does not provide for a binding method of delimitation. This means that the concerned Arctic States are free to choose any delimitation method they consider suitable. This thesis applies the three-step approach developed by international tribunals because it incorporates the most popular method of maritime delimitation, equidistance. However, the application of the methodology of international tribunals to the case of the Central Arctic Ocean revealed issues that are unique for the ECSs and demand the adjustment of the method for the identification of the relevant coasts and relevant area in delimitation. Differences between the continental shelves within and beyond 200 M make the application of the three-step approach challenging. The argument that this thesis develops is that the distinctions between the two types of the shelves influence the delimitation, and hence, these distinctions should be considered by States and international tribunals when establishing borders between the continental shelves beyond 200 M. This thesis also considers the interplay between the regimes of the continental shelf and the Arctic and analyzes how the ECSs in the Arctic can be delimited. Whereas this thesis does not provide the ultimate solution for the delimitation of the ECSs in the Central Arctic Ocean, it attempts to analyze what legal and non-legal factors will influence the establishment of the maritime borders between Russia, Denmark, and Canada and suggests a delimitation scenario. PhD
author2 Lamp, Nicolas
Law
format Thesis
author Antsygina, Ekaterina
author_facet Antsygina, Ekaterina
author_sort Antsygina, Ekaterina
title Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North
title_short Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North
title_full Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North
title_fullStr Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North
title_full_unstemmed Dividing the Arctic: Sovereign Rights on Extended Continental Shelves in The High North
title_sort dividing the arctic: sovereign rights on extended continental shelves in the high north
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/1974/29450
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canada
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Central Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Central Arctic
op_relation Canadian theses
http://hdl.handle.net/1974/29450
op_rights Queen's University's Thesis/Dissertation Non-Exclusive License for Deposit to QSpace and Library and Archives Canada
ProQuest PhD and Master's Theses International Dissemination Agreement
Intellectual Property Guidelines at Queen's University
Copying and Preserving Your Thesis
This publication is made available by the authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced except as permitted by the copyright laws without written authority from the copyright owner.
_version_ 1766309035085135872