Gender inequity in cancer research leadership in Europe: time to act

Aim Cancer is one of Europe’s key research missions, with gender equity a major policy pillar. To benchmark how well European countries perform for gender balance in cancer research, high quality intelligence is required. Methods For cancer research papers in Europe (EUR31; the 28 EU Member States p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Cancer
Main Authors: Lawler, Mark, Lewison, Grant, Oliver, Kathy, Roe, Philip, Webber, Richard, Sharp, Hamish, Lievens, Yolande, Sullivan, Richard
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pure.qub.ac.uk/en/publications/b961cd80-d90a-4f44-aeed-7ada7a0a2812
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113345
Description
Summary:Aim Cancer is one of Europe’s key research missions, with gender equity a major policy pillar. To benchmark how well European countries perform for gender balance in cancer research, high quality intelligence is required. Methods For cancer research papers in Europe (EUR31; the 28 EU Member States plus Iceland, Norway and Switzerland) from two specific years (2009 and 2019), we evaluated the numbers of female authors overall and then the female last-author presence, as a proxy of female cancer research leadership. Results Overall, female authorship increased from 42% to 49%. In 2009, females represented 50% or more of cancer research authors in only five EUR31 countries. By 2019, that number had risen to 17. In Eastern European (EE) countries, females were more likely to be in the majority. The presence of female cancer research authors in the last (senior) author position increased from 24% to 34%. Five of the top six countries for female authorship in 2019 were from EE, whereas disappointingly four central European countries (Austria (AT), Czechia (CZ), Germany (DE) and Switzerland (CH)) were below the 25th percentile. A number of European powerhouses of cancer research (UK, DE, CH) underperformed in terms of female cancer research leadership. However, when cancer researchers from these countries worked abroad (e.g. Scandinavia, USA) the percentage of females was similar to that of their host countries. A factor potentially influencing female cancer research participation was availability and relative cost of child-care, which is more favourable in Scandinavia and EE than in central/western Europe. Conclusion Our data show that Horizon Europe’s Cancer Mission must ensure gender equity in its future research programmes and support the enhancement of female cancer research leadership opportunities.