Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate

We weighted krill density values as data are overdispersed (i.e., its variance ishigher than its mean), so that using the mean in the analysis would probably lead to a misinterpretation of thecorrelation between variables being tested. Cross-correlation methods allow the identification of the time l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Mammal Science
Main Author: Félix Grijalva, Fernando
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4515
https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mms.12805
id ftpucecuador:oai:repositorio.puce.edu.ec:123456789/4515
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpucecuador:oai:repositorio.puce.edu.ec:123456789/4515 2024-09-15T17:46:31+00:00 Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate Félix Grijalva, Fernando Félix Grijalva, Fernando 2021-03 https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4515 https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mms.12805 unknown 0824-0469 https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mms.12805 https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4515 OpenAccess Ecología marina Reproducción animal Mamíferos acuáticos Ballena 2021 ftpucecuador https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805 2024-06-24T03:27:38Z We weighted krill density values as data are overdispersed (i.e., its variance ishigher than its mean), so that using the mean in the analysis would probably lead to a misinterpretation of thecorrelation between variables being tested. Cross-correlation methods allow the identification of the time lag thatmaximizes the correlation between the explanatory and the response variables (Legendre & Legendre, 1998) andwas run in PAST software version 3.0 (Hammer et al., 2001). The result was later used in a regression model run inR software version 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2020) to test the relationship between krill biomass and RBR weighted byeffort (number of trips of each year). We considered a 0.05 level of significance in the analysis.Relative birth rates of humpback whales were computed from data collected during 278 whale-watching trips(M = 39.7 ± 7.9 per year) (Table 1). A total of 127 calves (M = 18.1 ± 13.2 per year) and 1,637 noncalves (M = 233.8± 130.4 per year) were recorded, excluding resights. The RBR (M = 0.07 ± 0.03) was significantly correlated with krilldensity in the previous year (i.e., lagged by 1 year; r2= 0.9, p = .02; Figure 2). The relationship between RBR and krilldensity in the previous year balanced by the number of trips was also positive and significant (r2= 0.8, p = .02).This is the first time that the relationship between environmental conditions around the Antarctic Peninsula andcalf production by humpback whales from Breeding Stock G has been investigated. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Euphausia superba Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador: Repositorio Digital PUCE Marine Mammal Science 37 4 1498 1506
institution Open Polar
collection Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador: Repositorio Digital PUCE
op_collection_id ftpucecuador
language unknown
topic Ecología marina
Reproducción animal
Mamíferos acuáticos
Ballena
spellingShingle Ecología marina
Reproducción animal
Mamíferos acuáticos
Ballena
Félix Grijalva, Fernando
Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate
topic_facet Ecología marina
Reproducción animal
Mamíferos acuáticos
Ballena
description We weighted krill density values as data are overdispersed (i.e., its variance ishigher than its mean), so that using the mean in the analysis would probably lead to a misinterpretation of thecorrelation between variables being tested. Cross-correlation methods allow the identification of the time lag thatmaximizes the correlation between the explanatory and the response variables (Legendre & Legendre, 1998) andwas run in PAST software version 3.0 (Hammer et al., 2001). The result was later used in a regression model run inR software version 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2020) to test the relationship between krill biomass and RBR weighted byeffort (number of trips of each year). We considered a 0.05 level of significance in the analysis.Relative birth rates of humpback whales were computed from data collected during 278 whale-watching trips(M = 39.7 ± 7.9 per year) (Table 1). A total of 127 calves (M = 18.1 ± 13.2 per year) and 1,637 noncalves (M = 233.8± 130.4 per year) were recorded, excluding resights. The RBR (M = 0.07 ± 0.03) was significantly correlated with krilldensity in the previous year (i.e., lagged by 1 year; r2= 0.9, p = .02; Figure 2). The relationship between RBR and krilldensity in the previous year balanced by the number of trips was also positive and significant (r2= 0.8, p = .02).This is the first time that the relationship between environmental conditions around the Antarctic Peninsula andcalf production by humpback whales from Breeding Stock G has been investigated.
author2 Félix Grijalva, Fernando
author Félix Grijalva, Fernando
author_facet Félix Grijalva, Fernando
author_sort Félix Grijalva, Fernando
title Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate
title_short Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate
title_full Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate
title_fullStr Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate
title_full_unstemmed Influence of krill (Euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate
title_sort influence of krill (euphausia superba) availability on humpback whale (megaptera novaeangliae) reproductive rate
publishDate 2021
url https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4515
https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mms.12805
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Euphausia superba
Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Euphausia superba
Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
op_relation 0824-0469
https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mms.12805
https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4515
op_rights OpenAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12805
container_title Marine Mammal Science
container_volume 37
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1498
op_container_end_page 1506
_version_ 1810494721623064576