Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review

BACKGROUND: Priority patients in primary care include people from low-income, rural, or culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and First Nations people. AIM: To describe the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools that have been tested by family doctors wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of General Practice
Main Authors: Ball, Lauren, Brickley, Bryce, Williams, Lauren T, Advocat, Jenny, Rieger, Elizabeth, Ng, Raeann, Gunatillaka, Nilakshi, Clark, Alexander M, Sturgiss, Elizabeth
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926293/
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9926293
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9926293 2023-05-15T16:16:55+02:00 Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review Ball, Lauren Brickley, Bryce Williams, Lauren T Advocat, Jenny Rieger, Elizabeth Ng, Raeann Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Clark, Alexander M Sturgiss, Elizabeth 2023-02 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926293/ https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328 en eng Royal College of General Practitioners http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926293/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328 © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). CC-BY Br J Gen Pract Research Text 2023 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328 2023-02-19T02:03:06Z BACKGROUND: Priority patients in primary care include people from low-income, rural, or culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and First Nations people. AIM: To describe the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools that have been tested by family doctors working with priority patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: A global systematic review. METHOD: Five databases were searched for studies published from 2000 to 2021, of any design, that tested the effectiveness or feasibility of tangible, publicly available behaviour change tools used by family doctors working with priority patients. The methodological quality of each study was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Thirteen of 4931 studies screened met the eligibility criteria, and described 12 tools. The health-related behaviours targeted included smoking, diet and/or physical activity, alcohol and/or drug use, and suicidal ideation. Six tools had an online/web/app-based focus; the remaining six utilised only printed materials and/or in-person training. The effectiveness of the tools was assessed in 11 studies, which used diverse methods, with promising results for enabling behaviour change. The nine studies that assessed feasibility found that the tools were easy to use and enhanced the perceived quality of care. CONCLUSION: Many of the identified behaviour change tools were demonstrated to be effective at facilitating change in a target behaviour and/or feasible for use in practice. The tools varied across factors, such as the mode of delivery and the way the tool was intended to influence behaviour. There is clear opportunity to build on existing tools to enable family doctors to assist priority patients towards achieving healthier lifestyles. Text First Nations PubMed Central (PMC) British Journal of General Practice BJGP.2022.0328
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research
spellingShingle Research
Ball, Lauren
Brickley, Bryce
Williams, Lauren T
Advocat, Jenny
Rieger, Elizabeth
Ng, Raeann
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
Clark, Alexander M
Sturgiss, Elizabeth
Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
topic_facet Research
description BACKGROUND: Priority patients in primary care include people from low-income, rural, or culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and First Nations people. AIM: To describe the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools that have been tested by family doctors working with priority patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: A global systematic review. METHOD: Five databases were searched for studies published from 2000 to 2021, of any design, that tested the effectiveness or feasibility of tangible, publicly available behaviour change tools used by family doctors working with priority patients. The methodological quality of each study was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Thirteen of 4931 studies screened met the eligibility criteria, and described 12 tools. The health-related behaviours targeted included smoking, diet and/or physical activity, alcohol and/or drug use, and suicidal ideation. Six tools had an online/web/app-based focus; the remaining six utilised only printed materials and/or in-person training. The effectiveness of the tools was assessed in 11 studies, which used diverse methods, with promising results for enabling behaviour change. The nine studies that assessed feasibility found that the tools were easy to use and enhanced the perceived quality of care. CONCLUSION: Many of the identified behaviour change tools were demonstrated to be effective at facilitating change in a target behaviour and/or feasible for use in practice. The tools varied across factors, such as the mode of delivery and the way the tool was intended to influence behaviour. There is clear opportunity to build on existing tools to enable family doctors to assist priority patients towards achieving healthier lifestyles.
format Text
author Ball, Lauren
Brickley, Bryce
Williams, Lauren T
Advocat, Jenny
Rieger, Elizabeth
Ng, Raeann
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
Clark, Alexander M
Sturgiss, Elizabeth
author_facet Ball, Lauren
Brickley, Bryce
Williams, Lauren T
Advocat, Jenny
Rieger, Elizabeth
Ng, Raeann
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
Clark, Alexander M
Sturgiss, Elizabeth
author_sort Ball, Lauren
title Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
title_short Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
title_full Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
title_sort effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of behaviour change tools used by family doctors: a global systematic review
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
publishDate 2023
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926293/
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Br J Gen Pract
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926293/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328
op_rights © The Authors
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0328
container_title British Journal of General Practice
container_start_page BJGP.2022.0328
_version_ 1766002760279392256