Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator

BACKGROUND: Studying animal movement in the context of the optimal foraging theory has led to the development of simple movement metrics for inferring feeding activity. Yet, the predictive capacity of these metrics in natural environments has been given little attention, raising serious questions of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Movement Ecology
Main Authors: Allegue, Hassen, Réale, Denis, Picard, Baptiste, Guinet, Christophe
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862577/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681811
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9862577
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9862577 2023-05-15T16:05:24+02:00 Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator Allegue, Hassen Réale, Denis Picard, Baptiste Guinet, Christophe 2023-01-21 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862577/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681811 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2 en eng BioMed Central http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862577/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. CC0 PDM CC-BY Mov Ecol Methodology Text 2023 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2 2023-01-29T01:49:14Z BACKGROUND: Studying animal movement in the context of the optimal foraging theory has led to the development of simple movement metrics for inferring feeding activity. Yet, the predictive capacity of these metrics in natural environments has been given little attention, raising serious questions of the validity of these metrics. The aim of this study is to test whether simple continuous movement metrics predict feeding intensity in a marine predator, the southern elephant seal (SES; Mirounga leonine), and investigate potential factors influencing the predictive capacity of these metrics. METHODS: We equipped 21 female SES from the Kerguelen Archipelago with loggers and recorded their movements during post-breeding foraging trips at sea. From accelerometry, we estimated the number of prey encounter events (nPEE) and used it as a reference for feeding intensity. We also extracted several track- and dive-based movement metrics and evaluated how well they explain and predict the variance in nPEE. We conducted our analysis at two temporal scales (dive and day), with two dive profile resolutions (high at 1 Hz and low with five dive segments), and two types of models (linear models and regression trees). RESULTS: We found that none of the movement metrics predict nPEE with satisfactory power. The vertical transit rates (primarily the ascent rate) during dives had the best predictive performance among all metrics. Dive metrics performed better than track metrics and all metrics performed on average better at the scale of days than the scale of dives. However, the performance of the models at the scale of days showed higher variability among individuals suggesting distinct foraging tactics. Dive-based metrics performed better when computed from high-resolution dive profiles than low-resolution dive profiles. Finally, regression trees produced more accurate predictions than linear models. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that simple movement metrics do not predict feeding activity in free-ranging marine predators. This ... Text Elephant Seal Southern Elephant Seal PubMed Central (PMC) Kerguelen Movement Ecology 11 1
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Methodology
spellingShingle Methodology
Allegue, Hassen
Réale, Denis
Picard, Baptiste
Guinet, Christophe
Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
topic_facet Methodology
description BACKGROUND: Studying animal movement in the context of the optimal foraging theory has led to the development of simple movement metrics for inferring feeding activity. Yet, the predictive capacity of these metrics in natural environments has been given little attention, raising serious questions of the validity of these metrics. The aim of this study is to test whether simple continuous movement metrics predict feeding intensity in a marine predator, the southern elephant seal (SES; Mirounga leonine), and investigate potential factors influencing the predictive capacity of these metrics. METHODS: We equipped 21 female SES from the Kerguelen Archipelago with loggers and recorded their movements during post-breeding foraging trips at sea. From accelerometry, we estimated the number of prey encounter events (nPEE) and used it as a reference for feeding intensity. We also extracted several track- and dive-based movement metrics and evaluated how well they explain and predict the variance in nPEE. We conducted our analysis at two temporal scales (dive and day), with two dive profile resolutions (high at 1 Hz and low with five dive segments), and two types of models (linear models and regression trees). RESULTS: We found that none of the movement metrics predict nPEE with satisfactory power. The vertical transit rates (primarily the ascent rate) during dives had the best predictive performance among all metrics. Dive metrics performed better than track metrics and all metrics performed on average better at the scale of days than the scale of dives. However, the performance of the models at the scale of days showed higher variability among individuals suggesting distinct foraging tactics. Dive-based metrics performed better when computed from high-resolution dive profiles than low-resolution dive profiles. Finally, regression trees produced more accurate predictions than linear models. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that simple movement metrics do not predict feeding activity in free-ranging marine predators. This ...
format Text
author Allegue, Hassen
Réale, Denis
Picard, Baptiste
Guinet, Christophe
author_facet Allegue, Hassen
Réale, Denis
Picard, Baptiste
Guinet, Christophe
author_sort Allegue, Hassen
title Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_short Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_full Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_fullStr Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_full_unstemmed Track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
title_sort track and dive-based movement metrics do not predict the number of prey encountered by a marine predator
publisher BioMed Central
publishDate 2023
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862577/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681811
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2
geographic Kerguelen
geographic_facet Kerguelen
genre Elephant Seal
Southern Elephant Seal
genre_facet Elephant Seal
Southern Elephant Seal
op_source Mov Ecol
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9862577/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2
op_rights © The Author(s) 2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
op_rightsnorm CC0
PDM
CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-022-00361-2
container_title Movement Ecology
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766401288851947520