Justification of CT practices across Europe: results of a survey of national competent authorities and radiology societies

• Published in: Insights into Imaging
• Main Authors: Foley, Shane J., Bly, Ritva, Brady, Adrian P., Ebdon-Jackson, Steve, Karoussou-Schreiner, Alexandra, Hierath, Monika, Sosna, Jacob, Brkljačić, Boris
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Springer Vienna 2022
• Subjects: Original Article; Norway; Iceland
• Online Access: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684387/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36417017; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01325-1

OBJECTIVES: Published literature on justification of computed tomography (CT) examinations in Europe is sparse but demonstrates consistent sub-optimal application. As part of the EU initiated CT justification project, this work set out to capture CT justification practices across Europe. METHODS: An electronic questionnaire consisting of mostly closed multiple-choice questions was distributed to national competent authorities and to presidents of European radiology societies in EU member states as well as Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and the UK (n = 31). RESULTS: Fifty-one results were received from 30 European countries. Just 47% (n = 24) stated that advance justification of individual CT examinations is performed by a medical practitioner. Radiologists alone mostly (n = 27, 53%) perform daily justification of CT referrals although this is a shared responsibility in many countries. Imaging referral guidelines are widely available although just 13% (n = 6) consider them in daily use. Four countries (Cyprus, Ireland, Sweden, UK) reported having them embedded within clinical decision support systems. Justification of new practices with CT is mostly regulated (77%) although three countries (Belgium, Iceland and Portugal) reported not having any national system in place for generic justification. Health screening with CT was reported by seven countries as part of approved screening programmes and by eight countries outside. When performed, CT justification audits were reported to improve CT justification rates. CONCLUSIONS: CT justification practices vary across Europe with less than 50% using advance justification and a minority having clinical decision support systems in place. CT for health screening purposes is not currently widely used in Europe. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01325-1.