Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate limiting factors of American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR Boolean remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compare patients who fulfil the criteria to patients who only partly fulfil the criteria, with respect to imaging inflammation and biologic disease modifying...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:RMD Open
Main Authors: Paulshus Sundlisæter, Nina, Sundin, Ulf, Aga, Anna-Birgitte, Sexton, Joseph, Hammer, Hilde Berner, Uhlig, Till, Kvien, Tore K, Haavardsholm, Espen A, Lillegraven, Siri
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804675/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35091463
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002013
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:8804675
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:8804675 2023-05-15T15:11:19+02:00 Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study Paulshus Sundlisæter, Nina Sundin, Ulf Aga, Anna-Birgitte Sexton, Joseph Hammer, Hilde Berner Uhlig, Till Kvien, Tore K Haavardsholm, Espen A Lillegraven, Siri 2022-01-28 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804675/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35091463 https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002013 en eng BMJ Publishing Group http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804675/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35091463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002013 © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . CC-BY-NC RMD Open Rheumatoid Arthritis Text 2022 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002013 2022-02-13T01:32:49Z OBJECTIVE: To investigate limiting factors of American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR Boolean remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compare patients who fulfil the criteria to patients who only partly fulfil the criteria, with respect to imaging inflammation and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) usage. METHODS: Patients with DMARD-naïve RA were treated according to current recommendations in the the ARCTIC trial (Aiming for Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial examining the benefit of ultrasound in a Clinical TIght Control regimen). Limiting factors of reaching ACR/EULAR Boolean remission at 2 years were assessed. Imaging inflammation (ultrasound and MRI) in patients in remission was compared with patients failing to fulfil different components of the criteria. The OR of biologic therapy was calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 203 patients, 112 (55%) reached ACR/EULAR Boolean remission; 49 (24%) fulfilled three of four criteria. The main limiting factors were patient global assessment (PGA) (59%) and tender joints (22%). Imaging inflammation was not significantly different for patients in remission and patients not fulfilling the criteria due to elevated PGA and/or tender joints, but higher odds of using biologics (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.73 to 7.61) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PGA and tender joints were the factors most often limiting achievement of ACR/EULAR Boolean remission. The level of imaging inflammation was not elevated in these patients compared with patients in remission, but the odds of using biologic DMARDs were higher. Text Arctic PubMed Central (PMC) Arctic RMD Open 8 1 e002013
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Rheumatoid Arthritis
spellingShingle Rheumatoid Arthritis
Paulshus Sundlisæter, Nina
Sundin, Ulf
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Sexton, Joseph
Hammer, Hilde Berner
Uhlig, Till
Kvien, Tore K
Haavardsholm, Espen A
Lillegraven, Siri
Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study
topic_facet Rheumatoid Arthritis
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate limiting factors of American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR Boolean remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compare patients who fulfil the criteria to patients who only partly fulfil the criteria, with respect to imaging inflammation and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) usage. METHODS: Patients with DMARD-naïve RA were treated according to current recommendations in the the ARCTIC trial (Aiming for Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial examining the benefit of ultrasound in a Clinical TIght Control regimen). Limiting factors of reaching ACR/EULAR Boolean remission at 2 years were assessed. Imaging inflammation (ultrasound and MRI) in patients in remission was compared with patients failing to fulfil different components of the criteria. The OR of biologic therapy was calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 203 patients, 112 (55%) reached ACR/EULAR Boolean remission; 49 (24%) fulfilled three of four criteria. The main limiting factors were patient global assessment (PGA) (59%) and tender joints (22%). Imaging inflammation was not significantly different for patients in remission and patients not fulfilling the criteria due to elevated PGA and/or tender joints, but higher odds of using biologics (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.73 to 7.61) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PGA and tender joints were the factors most often limiting achievement of ACR/EULAR Boolean remission. The level of imaging inflammation was not elevated in these patients compared with patients in remission, but the odds of using biologic DMARDs were higher.
format Text
author Paulshus Sundlisæter, Nina
Sundin, Ulf
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Sexton, Joseph
Hammer, Hilde Berner
Uhlig, Till
Kvien, Tore K
Haavardsholm, Espen A
Lillegraven, Siri
author_facet Paulshus Sundlisæter, Nina
Sundin, Ulf
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Sexton, Joseph
Hammer, Hilde Berner
Uhlig, Till
Kvien, Tore K
Haavardsholm, Espen A
Lillegraven, Siri
author_sort Paulshus Sundlisæter, Nina
title Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study
title_short Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study
title_full Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study
title_fullStr Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study
title_full_unstemmed Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study
title_sort inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving acr/eular boolean remission in a treat-to-target study
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2022
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804675/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35091463
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002013
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source RMD Open
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804675/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35091463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002013
op_rights © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002013
container_title RMD Open
container_volume 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page e002013
_version_ 1766342194727223296