An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada

BACKGROUND: Self testing for HIV is a targeted intervention with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing and more effectively reach the undiagnosed, especially in priority populations. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the INSTI HIV self-test perform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Public Health
Main Authors: Galli, Richard A., Lo Hog Tian, Jason M., Sumner-Williams, Michelle, McBain, Kristin, Stanizai, Emal, Tharao, Wangari, Aden, Muna, Jamieson, Heather, Da Silva, Mark, Vassal, Anne-Fanny, Guilbault, Lorie, Ireland, Laurie, Witges, Kim, King, Alexandra, Ametepee, Kehinde, Lachowsky, Nathan J., Pant Pai, Nitika, Mazzulli, Tony, Rourke, Sean B.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286440/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275450
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:8286440
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research Article
spellingShingle Research Article
Galli, Richard A.
Lo Hog Tian, Jason M.
Sumner-Williams, Michelle
McBain, Kristin
Stanizai, Emal
Tharao, Wangari
Aden, Muna
Jamieson, Heather
Da Silva, Mark
Vassal, Anne-Fanny
Guilbault, Lorie
Ireland, Laurie
Witges, Kim
King, Alexandra
Ametepee, Kehinde
Lachowsky, Nathan J.
Pant Pai, Nitika
Mazzulli, Tony
Rourke, Sean B.
An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada
topic_facet Research Article
description BACKGROUND: Self testing for HIV is a targeted intervention with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing and more effectively reach the undiagnosed, especially in priority populations. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the INSTI HIV self-test performance compared with laboratory reference testing, (2) document if intended users can perform the steps to use the HIV self-test device, and (3) document if intended users can successfully interpret contrived positive, negative, and invalid results. Study was intended to be submitted to Health Canada for review for regulatory approval purposes. METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional design and recruited consenting adults who were representative of intended users of HIV self-testing from four community sites across Ontario, Québec, and Manitoba between August 2019 and March 2020. The results of the observed HIV self-test were compared with results of the Abbott Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo test. Usability outcomes for critical (e.g., lancing finger, blood droplet into bottle, shaking bottle four times) and noncritical self-test procedure steps were also determined. RESULTS: Overall, 77% (n = 522) of participants were between 18 and 45 years of age, 61% (n = 410) were male, 71% (n = 480) had some college or more education, and 45% (n = 307) were employed; identity for race and ethnicity: Caucasian (44%; n = 296), African, Caribbean or Black (17%; n = 113), Indigenous [First Nations, Métis or Inuit] (14%; n = 95), Asian (16%; n = 106), Latin American (7%; n = 46). Primary performance analysis on 678 completed HIV self-tests revealed a positive percent agreement of 100% (5/5, 95% CI: 43.6–97.0%) and a negative percent agreement of 99.5% (614/617, 95% CI: 98.6–99.8%) with the comparator method. The overall percent agreement of results interpretation between participant and observer was 93.5% (n = 633). For the 708 participants who took part in the usability study, the average success rate for steps determined to be ...
format Text
author Galli, Richard A.
Lo Hog Tian, Jason M.
Sumner-Williams, Michelle
McBain, Kristin
Stanizai, Emal
Tharao, Wangari
Aden, Muna
Jamieson, Heather
Da Silva, Mark
Vassal, Anne-Fanny
Guilbault, Lorie
Ireland, Laurie
Witges, Kim
King, Alexandra
Ametepee, Kehinde
Lachowsky, Nathan J.
Pant Pai, Nitika
Mazzulli, Tony
Rourke, Sean B.
author_facet Galli, Richard A.
Lo Hog Tian, Jason M.
Sumner-Williams, Michelle
McBain, Kristin
Stanizai, Emal
Tharao, Wangari
Aden, Muna
Jamieson, Heather
Da Silva, Mark
Vassal, Anne-Fanny
Guilbault, Lorie
Ireland, Laurie
Witges, Kim
King, Alexandra
Ametepee, Kehinde
Lachowsky, Nathan J.
Pant Pai, Nitika
Mazzulli, Tony
Rourke, Sean B.
author_sort Galli, Richard A.
title An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada
title_short An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada
title_full An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada
title_fullStr An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada
title_full_unstemmed An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada
title_sort observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based hiv self-test in canada
publisher BioMed Central
publishDate 2021
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286440/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275450
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.133,-62.133,-64.100,-64.100)
geographic Abbott
Canada
geographic_facet Abbott
Canada
genre First Nations
inuit
genre_facet First Nations
inuit
op_source BMC Public Health
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286440/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z
op_rights © The Author(s) 2021
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
op_rightsnorm CC0
PDM
CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z
container_title BMC Public Health
container_volume 21
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766002993128275968
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:8286440 2023-05-15T16:17:09+02:00 An observed, prospective field study to evaluate the performance and acceptance of a blood-based HIV self-test in Canada Galli, Richard A. Lo Hog Tian, Jason M. Sumner-Williams, Michelle McBain, Kristin Stanizai, Emal Tharao, Wangari Aden, Muna Jamieson, Heather Da Silva, Mark Vassal, Anne-Fanny Guilbault, Lorie Ireland, Laurie Witges, Kim King, Alexandra Ametepee, Kehinde Lachowsky, Nathan J. Pant Pai, Nitika Mazzulli, Tony Rourke, Sean B. 2021-07-18 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286440/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275450 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z en eng BioMed Central http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286440/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. CC0 PDM CC-BY BMC Public Health Research Article Text 2021 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11418-z 2021-07-25T00:38:53Z BACKGROUND: Self testing for HIV is a targeted intervention with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing and more effectively reach the undiagnosed, especially in priority populations. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the INSTI HIV self-test performance compared with laboratory reference testing, (2) document if intended users can perform the steps to use the HIV self-test device, and (3) document if intended users can successfully interpret contrived positive, negative, and invalid results. Study was intended to be submitted to Health Canada for review for regulatory approval purposes. METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional design and recruited consenting adults who were representative of intended users of HIV self-testing from four community sites across Ontario, Québec, and Manitoba between August 2019 and March 2020. The results of the observed HIV self-test were compared with results of the Abbott Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo test. Usability outcomes for critical (e.g., lancing finger, blood droplet into bottle, shaking bottle four times) and noncritical self-test procedure steps were also determined. RESULTS: Overall, 77% (n = 522) of participants were between 18 and 45 years of age, 61% (n = 410) were male, 71% (n = 480) had some college or more education, and 45% (n = 307) were employed; identity for race and ethnicity: Caucasian (44%; n = 296), African, Caribbean or Black (17%; n = 113), Indigenous [First Nations, Métis or Inuit] (14%; n = 95), Asian (16%; n = 106), Latin American (7%; n = 46). Primary performance analysis on 678 completed HIV self-tests revealed a positive percent agreement of 100% (5/5, 95% CI: 43.6–97.0%) and a negative percent agreement of 99.5% (614/617, 95% CI: 98.6–99.8%) with the comparator method. The overall percent agreement of results interpretation between participant and observer was 93.5% (n = 633). For the 708 participants who took part in the usability study, the average success rate for steps determined to be ... Text First Nations inuit PubMed Central (PMC) Abbott ENVELOPE(-62.133,-62.133,-64.100,-64.100) Canada BMC Public Health 21 1