Head adaptation for sound production and feeding strategy in dolphins (Odontoceti: Delphinida)

• Published in: Journal of Anatomy
• Main Authors: Frainer, Guilherme, Huggenberger, Stefan, Moreno, Ignacio B., Plön, Stephanie, Galatius, Anders
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
• Subjects: Original Papers; toothed whales
• Online Access: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8053589/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319356; https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13364

Head morphology in toothed whales evolved under selective pressures on feeding strategy and sound production. The postnatal development of the skull (n = 207) and mandible (n = 219) of six Delphinida species which differ in feeding strategy but exhibit similar sound emission patterns, including two narrow‐band high‐frequency species, were investigated through 3D morphometrics. Morphological changes throughout ontogeny were demonstrated based on the main source of variation (i.e., prediction lines) and the common allometric component. Multivariate trajectory analysis with pairwise comparisons between all species was performed to evaluate specific differences on the postnatal development of skulls and mandibles. Changes in the rostrum formation contributed to the variation (skull: 49%; mandible: 90%) of the entire data set and might not only reflect the feeding strategy adopted by each lineage but also represents an adaptation for sound production and reception. As an important structure for directionality of sound emissions, this may increase directionality in raptorial feeders. Phylogenetic generalized least squares analyses indicated that shape of the anterior portion of the skull is strongly dependent on phylogeny and might not only reflect feeding mode, but also morphological adaptations for sound production, particularly in raptorial species. Thus, postnatal development seems to represent a crucial stage for biosonar maturation in some raptorial species such as Pontoporia blainvillei and Sousa plumbea. The ontogeny of their main tool for navigation and hunting might reflect their natural history peculiarities and thus potentially define their main vulnerabilities to anthropogenic changes in the environment.