Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus)

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal breeding in recent years has benefited greatly from the availability of large-scale genetic information. The most widely applied genomic tools in selective breeding are specialized arrays that use DNA hybridization. However, the high financial investments accompanying this pra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals
Main Authors: Pappas, Fotis, Palaiokostas, Christos
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004150/
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030899
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:8004150
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:8004150 2023-05-15T14:30:03+02:00 Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus) Pappas, Fotis Palaiokostas, Christos 2021-03-21 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004150/ https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030899 en eng MDPI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004150/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030899 © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). CC-BY Animals (Basel) Article Text 2021 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030899 2021-04-04T01:12:00Z SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal breeding in recent years has benefited greatly from the availability of large-scale genetic information. The most widely applied genomic tools in selective breeding are specialized arrays that use DNA hybridization. However, the high financial investments accompanying this practice impair the profitability of emerging aquaculture species, including Arctic charr. The aim of the current study was to assess and compare the potential of two cost-efficient genotyping strategies applicable in a variety of breeding-related tasks, such as pedigree verification, genetic diversity screening and detection of genomic regions that are associated with phenotypes of economic importance. Both strategies are based on reduced representation sequencing but differ in sequencing coverage (low and high). The low coverage strategy offers a higher density of DNA markers, but also presents a greater proportion of missing data in the marker set and is characterized by more uncertainty in determining heterozygosity compared to high coverage. Our results show that while high coverage genotyping performs better in genetic diversity and kinship analyses, a low coverage strategy is more successful in identifying genomic regions associated with phenotypic traits, leading to the conclusion that both strategies could be of value into selection schemes. ABSTRACT: Incorporation of genomic technologies into fish breeding programs is a modern reality, promising substantial advances regarding the accuracy of selection, monitoring the genetic diversity and pedigree record verification. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays are the most commonly used genomic tool, but the investments required make them unsustainable for emerging species, such as Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), where production volume is low. The requirement to genotype a large number of animals for breeding practices necessitates cost effective genotyping approaches. In the current study, we used double digest restriction site-associated DNA (ddRAD) ... Text Arctic charr Arctic Salvelinus alpinus PubMed Central (PMC) Arctic Animals 11 3 899
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Article
spellingShingle Article
Pappas, Fotis
Palaiokostas, Christos
Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
topic_facet Article
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Animal breeding in recent years has benefited greatly from the availability of large-scale genetic information. The most widely applied genomic tools in selective breeding are specialized arrays that use DNA hybridization. However, the high financial investments accompanying this practice impair the profitability of emerging aquaculture species, including Arctic charr. The aim of the current study was to assess and compare the potential of two cost-efficient genotyping strategies applicable in a variety of breeding-related tasks, such as pedigree verification, genetic diversity screening and detection of genomic regions that are associated with phenotypes of economic importance. Both strategies are based on reduced representation sequencing but differ in sequencing coverage (low and high). The low coverage strategy offers a higher density of DNA markers, but also presents a greater proportion of missing data in the marker set and is characterized by more uncertainty in determining heterozygosity compared to high coverage. Our results show that while high coverage genotyping performs better in genetic diversity and kinship analyses, a low coverage strategy is more successful in identifying genomic regions associated with phenotypic traits, leading to the conclusion that both strategies could be of value into selection schemes. ABSTRACT: Incorporation of genomic technologies into fish breeding programs is a modern reality, promising substantial advances regarding the accuracy of selection, monitoring the genetic diversity and pedigree record verification. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays are the most commonly used genomic tool, but the investments required make them unsustainable for emerging species, such as Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), where production volume is low. The requirement to genotype a large number of animals for breeding practices necessitates cost effective genotyping approaches. In the current study, we used double digest restriction site-associated DNA (ddRAD) ...
format Text
author Pappas, Fotis
Palaiokostas, Christos
author_facet Pappas, Fotis
Palaiokostas, Christos
author_sort Pappas, Fotis
title Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
title_short Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
title_full Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
title_fullStr Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
title_full_unstemmed Genotyping Strategies Using ddRAD Sequencing in Farmed Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
title_sort genotyping strategies using ddrad sequencing in farmed arctic charr (salvelinus alpinus)
publisher MDPI
publishDate 2021
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004150/
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030899
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic charr
Arctic
Salvelinus alpinus
genre_facet Arctic charr
Arctic
Salvelinus alpinus
op_source Animals (Basel)
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8004150/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11030899
op_rights © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030899
container_title Animals
container_volume 11
container_issue 3
container_start_page 899
_version_ 1766303970685353984