Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird

BACKGROUND: Habitat loss can force animals to relocate to new areas, where they would need to adjust to an unfamiliar resource landscape and find new breeding sites. Relocation may be costly and could compromise reproduction. METHODS: Here, we explored how the Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Movement Ecology
Main Authors: Kavelaars, Marwa M., Baert, Jan M., Stienen, Eric W. M., Shamoun-Baranes, Judy, Lens, Luc, Müller, Wendt
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653720/
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00231-9
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:7653720
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:7653720 2023-05-15T17:07:54+02:00 Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird Kavelaars, Marwa M. Baert, Jan M. Stienen, Eric W. M. Shamoun-Baranes, Judy Lens, Luc Müller, Wendt 2020-11-10 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653720/ https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00231-9 en eng BioMed Central http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00231-9 © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. CC0 PDM CC-BY Mov Ecol Research Text 2020 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00231-9 2020-11-22T01:26:33Z BACKGROUND: Habitat loss can force animals to relocate to new areas, where they would need to adjust to an unfamiliar resource landscape and find new breeding sites. Relocation may be costly and could compromise reproduction. METHODS: Here, we explored how the Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus), a colonial breeding seabird species with a wide ecological niche, responds to the loss of its breeding habitat. We investigated how individuals adjusted their foraging behaviour after relocating to another colony due to breeding site destruction, and whether there were any reproductive consequences in the first years after relocation. To this end, we compared offspring growth between resident individuals and individuals that recently relocated to the same colony due to breeding habitat loss. Using GPS-tracking, we further investigated the foraging behaviour of resident individuals in both colonies, as well as that of relocated individuals, as enhanced foraging effort could represent a potential driver of reproductive costs. RESULTS: We found negative consequences of relocation for offspring development, which were apparent when brood demand was experimentally increased. Recently relocated gulls travelled further distances for foraging than residents, as they often visited more distant foraging sites used by residents breeding in their natal colony as well as new areas outside the home range of the residents in the colony where they settled. CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that relocated individuals did not yet optimally adapt to the new food landscape, which was unexpected, given the social information on foraging locations that may have been available from resident neighbours in their new breeding colony. Even though the short-term reproductive costs were comparatively low, we show that generalist species, such as the Lesser black-backed gull, may be more vulnerable to habitat loss than expected. Long term studies are needed to investigate how long individuals are affected by their relocation in order to better ... Text Lesser black-backed gull PubMed Central (PMC) Movement Ecology 8 1
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research
spellingShingle Research
Kavelaars, Marwa M.
Baert, Jan M.
Stienen, Eric W. M.
Shamoun-Baranes, Judy
Lens, Luc
Müller, Wendt
Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird
topic_facet Research
description BACKGROUND: Habitat loss can force animals to relocate to new areas, where they would need to adjust to an unfamiliar resource landscape and find new breeding sites. Relocation may be costly and could compromise reproduction. METHODS: Here, we explored how the Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus), a colonial breeding seabird species with a wide ecological niche, responds to the loss of its breeding habitat. We investigated how individuals adjusted their foraging behaviour after relocating to another colony due to breeding site destruction, and whether there were any reproductive consequences in the first years after relocation. To this end, we compared offspring growth between resident individuals and individuals that recently relocated to the same colony due to breeding habitat loss. Using GPS-tracking, we further investigated the foraging behaviour of resident individuals in both colonies, as well as that of relocated individuals, as enhanced foraging effort could represent a potential driver of reproductive costs. RESULTS: We found negative consequences of relocation for offspring development, which were apparent when brood demand was experimentally increased. Recently relocated gulls travelled further distances for foraging than residents, as they often visited more distant foraging sites used by residents breeding in their natal colony as well as new areas outside the home range of the residents in the colony where they settled. CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that relocated individuals did not yet optimally adapt to the new food landscape, which was unexpected, given the social information on foraging locations that may have been available from resident neighbours in their new breeding colony. Even though the short-term reproductive costs were comparatively low, we show that generalist species, such as the Lesser black-backed gull, may be more vulnerable to habitat loss than expected. Long term studies are needed to investigate how long individuals are affected by their relocation in order to better ...
format Text
author Kavelaars, Marwa M.
Baert, Jan M.
Stienen, Eric W. M.
Shamoun-Baranes, Judy
Lens, Luc
Müller, Wendt
author_facet Kavelaars, Marwa M.
Baert, Jan M.
Stienen, Eric W. M.
Shamoun-Baranes, Judy
Lens, Luc
Müller, Wendt
author_sort Kavelaars, Marwa M.
title Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird
title_short Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird
title_full Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird
title_fullStr Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird
title_full_unstemmed Breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird
title_sort breeding habitat loss reveals limited foraging flexibility and increases foraging effort in a colonial breeding seabird
publisher BioMed Central
publishDate 2020
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653720/
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00231-9
genre Lesser black-backed gull
genre_facet Lesser black-backed gull
op_source Mov Ecol
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653720/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00231-9
op_rights © The Author(s) 2020
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
op_rightsnorm CC0
PDM
CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00231-9
container_title Movement Ecology
container_volume 8
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766063418549207040