Effects of ocean acidification on Antarctic marine organisms: A meta‐analysis

• Published in: Ecology and Evolution
• Main Authors: Hancock, Alyce M., King, Catherine K., Stark, Jonathan S., McMinn, Andrew, Davidson, Andrew T.
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
• Subjects: Review; Antarctic; Southern Ocean; Antarc*; Ocean acidification
• Online Access: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246202/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32489613; https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6205

Southern Ocean waters are among the most vulnerable to ocean acidification. The projected increase in the CO(2) level will cause changes in carbonate chemistry that are likely to be damaging to organisms inhabiting these waters. A meta‐analysis was undertaken to examine the vulnerability of Antarctic marine biota occupying waters south of 60°S to ocean acidification. This meta‐analysis showed that ocean acidification negatively affects autotrophic organisms, mainly phytoplankton, at CO(2) levels above 1,000 μatm and invertebrates above 1,500 μatm, but positively affects bacterial abundance. The sensitivity of phytoplankton to ocean acidification was influenced by the experimental procedure used. Natural, mixed communities were more sensitive than single species in culture and showed a decline in chlorophyll a concentration, productivity, and photosynthetic health, as well as a shift in community composition at CO(2) levels above 1,000 μatm. Invertebrates showed reduced fertilization rates and increased occurrence of larval abnormalities, as well as decreased calcification rates and increased shell dissolution with any increase in CO(2) level above 1,500 μatm. Assessment of the vulnerability of fish and macroalgae to ocean acidification was limited by the number of studies available. Overall, this analysis indicates that many marine organisms in the Southern Ocean are likely to be susceptible to ocean acidification and thereby likely to change their contribution to ecosystem services in the future. Further studies are required to address the poor spatial coverage, lack of community or ecosystem‐level studies, and the largely unknown potential for organisms to acclimate and/or adapt to the changing conditions.