Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming

Damages avoided – the principal benefit of mitigating climate change – are investigated in this chapter, particularly the potential adverse impacts on the primary sectors, biodiversity and human health. A review of studies indicates that climate change is unlikely to have much impact on agriculture...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: van Kooten, G. Cornelis
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120647/
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4988-7_7
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:7120647
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:7120647 2023-05-15T15:15:17+02:00 Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming van Kooten, G. Cornelis 2012-08-06 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120647/ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4988-7_7 en eng http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120647/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4988-7_7 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Article Text 2012 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4988-7_7 2020-04-12T00:29:06Z Damages avoided – the principal benefit of mitigating climate change – are investigated in this chapter, particularly the potential adverse impacts on the primary sectors, biodiversity and human health. A review of studies indicates that climate change is unlikely to have much impact on agriculture and forestry; projected climate change will increase productivity in some regions while reducing it in others, leading to a redistribution of land rents with little impact on overall output. When CO(2) fertilization is taken into account, there might even be an overall increase in primary sector productivity that results in more undisturbed land, thus protecting biodiversity. Other findings in this chapter also run counter to current shibboleths: The biggest threat to polar bears is hunting, not climate change; current trends in Arctic ice extent are not without historical precedent; sea level rise is not an imminent threat; extreme weather events are not increasing; malaria is not only a tropical disease; and human health is a function of income, not climate, with bottom-up models using UN data predicting that death rates from almost all causes will be lower with projected global warming than without it. Meanwhile, integrated assessment models (IAMs) simply assume damages are an arbitrary function of temperature; upon balancing discounted costs and benefits, IAMs can be used to find an optimal path (usually of a carbon tax or emissions cap) for mitigating climate change. It is shown that different assumptions regarding damages, the discount rate, and/or the probability of catastrophic damage can be used to justify completely different policies for addressing global warming. Therefore, a carbon tax that is contingent on the temperature in the troposphere above the tropics – where the earliest indication of global warming is predicted to occur – is considered to be the preferred policy strategy as it should appeal to global warming proponents and skeptics alike. Finally, the Kaya identity is used to demonstrate the ... Text Arctic Climate change Global warming Human health PubMed Central (PMC) Arctic 221 284 Dordrecht
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Article
spellingShingle Article
van Kooten, G. Cornelis
Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming
topic_facet Article
description Damages avoided – the principal benefit of mitigating climate change – are investigated in this chapter, particularly the potential adverse impacts on the primary sectors, biodiversity and human health. A review of studies indicates that climate change is unlikely to have much impact on agriculture and forestry; projected climate change will increase productivity in some regions while reducing it in others, leading to a redistribution of land rents with little impact on overall output. When CO(2) fertilization is taken into account, there might even be an overall increase in primary sector productivity that results in more undisturbed land, thus protecting biodiversity. Other findings in this chapter also run counter to current shibboleths: The biggest threat to polar bears is hunting, not climate change; current trends in Arctic ice extent are not without historical precedent; sea level rise is not an imminent threat; extreme weather events are not increasing; malaria is not only a tropical disease; and human health is a function of income, not climate, with bottom-up models using UN data predicting that death rates from almost all causes will be lower with projected global warming than without it. Meanwhile, integrated assessment models (IAMs) simply assume damages are an arbitrary function of temperature; upon balancing discounted costs and benefits, IAMs can be used to find an optimal path (usually of a carbon tax or emissions cap) for mitigating climate change. It is shown that different assumptions regarding damages, the discount rate, and/or the probability of catastrophic damage can be used to justify completely different policies for addressing global warming. Therefore, a carbon tax that is contingent on the temperature in the troposphere above the tropics – where the earliest indication of global warming is predicted to occur – is considered to be the preferred policy strategy as it should appeal to global warming proponents and skeptics alike. Finally, the Kaya identity is used to demonstrate the ...
format Text
author van Kooten, G. Cornelis
author_facet van Kooten, G. Cornelis
author_sort van Kooten, G. Cornelis
title Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming
title_short Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming
title_full Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming
title_fullStr Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming
title_full_unstemmed Economic Assessment of the Damages Caused by Global Warming
title_sort economic assessment of the damages caused by global warming
publishDate 2012
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120647/
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4988-7_7
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Global warming
Human health
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Global warming
Human health
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120647/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4988-7_7
op_rights © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4988-7_7
container_start_page 221
op_container_end_page 284
op_publisher_place Dordrecht
_version_ 1766345650356617216