Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative infections may be considered predictors of caesarean scar defect (CSD), and multidose antibiotics have a protective effect against CSD. However, the ability of adjunctive azithromycin combined with cephalosporin to reduce the prevalence of CSD remains unclear. The planned...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ Open
Main Authors: Cai, Yanqing, Pan, Hongjie, Zhang, Jian, Cheng, Weiwei, Shi, Yiru, Zeng, Min, Shi, Liye, Yu, Jin, Shen, Ying, Chen, Shan, Zhu, Qian, Mol, Ben W, Huang, Ding
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955559/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915163
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032379
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6955559
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6955559 2023-05-15T18:15:17+02:00 Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Cai, Yanqing Pan, Hongjie Zhang, Jian Cheng, Weiwei Shi, Yiru Zeng, Min Shi, Liye Yu, Jin Shen, Ying Chen, Shan Zhu, Qian Mol, Ben W Huang, Ding 2020-01-07 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955559/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915163 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032379 en eng BMJ Publishing Group http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955559/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032379 © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. CC-BY-NC Obstetrics and Gynaecology Text 2020 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032379 2020-02-02T01:16:10Z INTRODUCTION: Perioperative infections may be considered predictors of caesarean scar defect (CSD), and multidose antibiotics have a protective effect against CSD. However, the ability of adjunctive azithromycin combined with cephalosporin to reduce the prevalence of CSD remains unclear. The planned study aims to clarify the protective effect of antibiotics against CSD and to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for CSD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a double-blind, parallel-control randomised clinical trial that will be carried out at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital. A total of 220 eligible patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive either adjunctive azithromycin or single-dose cephalosporin 30 min before the incision. The evaluation criteria are the prevalence and characteristics of CSD as assessed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) at 42 days, 6 months and 12 months after delivery. The primary outcome will be the prevalence of CSD, and the characteristics of CSD will be assessed by TVU and SIS 42 days after delivery; all other outcomes are secondary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol received authorisation from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital on 25 April 2018 (approval no. GKLW2017-84). The findings will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-INR-17013272. Text SCAR PubMed Central (PMC) BMJ Open 10 1 e032379
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Cai, Yanqing
Pan, Hongjie
Zhang, Jian
Cheng, Weiwei
Shi, Yiru
Zeng, Min
Shi, Liye
Yu, Jin
Shen, Ying
Chen, Shan
Zhu, Qian
Mol, Ben W
Huang, Ding
Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic_facet Obstetrics and Gynaecology
description INTRODUCTION: Perioperative infections may be considered predictors of caesarean scar defect (CSD), and multidose antibiotics have a protective effect against CSD. However, the ability of adjunctive azithromycin combined with cephalosporin to reduce the prevalence of CSD remains unclear. The planned study aims to clarify the protective effect of antibiotics against CSD and to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for CSD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a double-blind, parallel-control randomised clinical trial that will be carried out at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital. A total of 220 eligible patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive either adjunctive azithromycin or single-dose cephalosporin 30 min before the incision. The evaluation criteria are the prevalence and characteristics of CSD as assessed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) at 42 days, 6 months and 12 months after delivery. The primary outcome will be the prevalence of CSD, and the characteristics of CSD will be assessed by TVU and SIS 42 days after delivery; all other outcomes are secondary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol received authorisation from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital on 25 April 2018 (approval no. GKLW2017-84). The findings will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-INR-17013272.
format Text
author Cai, Yanqing
Pan, Hongjie
Zhang, Jian
Cheng, Weiwei
Shi, Yiru
Zeng, Min
Shi, Liye
Yu, Jin
Shen, Ying
Chen, Shan
Zhu, Qian
Mol, Ben W
Huang, Ding
author_facet Cai, Yanqing
Pan, Hongjie
Zhang, Jian
Cheng, Weiwei
Shi, Yiru
Zeng, Min
Shi, Liye
Yu, Jin
Shen, Ying
Chen, Shan
Zhu, Qian
Mol, Ben W
Huang, Ding
author_sort Cai, Yanqing
title Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
publishDate 2020
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955559/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915163
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032379
genre SCAR
genre_facet SCAR
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955559/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032379
op_rights © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032379
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page e032379
_version_ 1766188391646363648