When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?

Increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD) increases atmospheric demand for water. While increased evapotranspiration (ET) in response to increased atmospheric demand seems intuitive, plants are capable of reducing ET in response to increased VPD by closing their stomata. We examine which effect domina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Main Authors: Massmann, Adam, Gentine, Pierre, Lin, Changjie
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919419/
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001790
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6919419
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6919419 2023-05-15T15:09:35+02:00 When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration? Massmann, Adam Gentine, Pierre Lin, Changjie 2019-10-28 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919419/ https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001790 en eng John Wiley and Sons Inc. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919419/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001790 ©2019. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. CC-BY Research Articles Text 2019 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001790 2020-01-05T01:35:56Z Increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD) increases atmospheric demand for water. While increased evapotranspiration (ET) in response to increased atmospheric demand seems intuitive, plants are capable of reducing ET in response to increased VPD by closing their stomata. We examine which effect dominates the response to increasing VPD: atmospheric demand and increases in ET or plant response (stomata closure) and decreases in ET. We use Penman‐Monteith, combined with semiempirical optimal stomatal regulation theory and underlying water use efficiency, to develop a theoretical framework for assessing ET response to VPD. The theory suggests that depending on the environment and plant characteristics, ET response to increasing VPD can vary from strongly decreasing to increasing, highlighting the diversity of plant water regulation strategies. The ET response varies due to (1) climate, with tropical and temperate climates more likely to exhibit a positive ET response to increasing VPD than boreal and arctic climates; (2) photosynthesis strategy, with C3 plants more likely to exhibit a positive ET response than C4 plants; and (3) plant type, with crops more likely to exhibit a positive ET response, and shrubs and gymniosperm trees more likely to exhibit a negative ET response. These results, derived from previous literature connecting plant parameters to plant and climate characteristics, highlight the utility of our simplified framework for understanding complex land‐atmosphere systems in terms of idealized scenarios in which ET responds to VPD only. This response is otherwise challenging to assess in an environment where many processes coevolve together. Text Arctic PubMed Central (PMC) Arctic Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 11 10 3305 3320
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research Articles
spellingShingle Research Articles
Massmann, Adam
Gentine, Pierre
Lin, Changjie
When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?
topic_facet Research Articles
description Increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD) increases atmospheric demand for water. While increased evapotranspiration (ET) in response to increased atmospheric demand seems intuitive, plants are capable of reducing ET in response to increased VPD by closing their stomata. We examine which effect dominates the response to increasing VPD: atmospheric demand and increases in ET or plant response (stomata closure) and decreases in ET. We use Penman‐Monteith, combined with semiempirical optimal stomatal regulation theory and underlying water use efficiency, to develop a theoretical framework for assessing ET response to VPD. The theory suggests that depending on the environment and plant characteristics, ET response to increasing VPD can vary from strongly decreasing to increasing, highlighting the diversity of plant water regulation strategies. The ET response varies due to (1) climate, with tropical and temperate climates more likely to exhibit a positive ET response to increasing VPD than boreal and arctic climates; (2) photosynthesis strategy, with C3 plants more likely to exhibit a positive ET response than C4 plants; and (3) plant type, with crops more likely to exhibit a positive ET response, and shrubs and gymniosperm trees more likely to exhibit a negative ET response. These results, derived from previous literature connecting plant parameters to plant and climate characteristics, highlight the utility of our simplified framework for understanding complex land‐atmosphere systems in terms of idealized scenarios in which ET responds to VPD only. This response is otherwise challenging to assess in an environment where many processes coevolve together.
format Text
author Massmann, Adam
Gentine, Pierre
Lin, Changjie
author_facet Massmann, Adam
Gentine, Pierre
Lin, Changjie
author_sort Massmann, Adam
title When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?
title_short When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?
title_full When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?
title_fullStr When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?
title_full_unstemmed When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?
title_sort when does vapor pressure deficit drive or reduce evapotranspiration?
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
publishDate 2019
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919419/
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001790
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6919419/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001790
op_rights ©2019. The Authors.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001790
container_title Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
container_volume 11
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3305
op_container_end_page 3320
_version_ 1766340749956218880