Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study

BACKGROUND: Women are encouraged to make informed choices about mammography screening that align with their values and preferences, yet information materials developed by screening programs rarely provide complete, balanced information about screening. Through a series of deliberations with Ontario...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:CMAJ Open
Main Authors: Tripp, Laura, Abelson, Julia
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Joule Inc. or its licensors 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910141/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31836630
https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190102
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6910141
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6910141 2023-05-15T17:22:47+02:00 Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study Tripp, Laura Abelson, Julia 2019-12-09 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910141/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31836630 https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190102 en eng Joule Inc. or its licensors http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910141/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31836630 http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190102 Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors Research Text 2019 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190102 2020-01-12T01:14:25Z BACKGROUND: Women are encouraged to make informed choices about mammography screening that align with their values and preferences, yet information materials developed by screening programs rarely provide complete, balanced information about screening. Through a series of deliberations with Ontario citizens, we elicited perspectives on materials developed by screening programs to support informed decision-making. METHODS: We held 4 deliberative engagement events with citizens to discuss the current evidence about mammography and informed decision-making for the general population (i.e., women not at high risk) in the context of organized screening programs. Participants reviewed and provided feedback on the educational materials currently produced by screening programs in 8 provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador) and 2 territories (Yukon Territory and Northwest Territory) and identified the key features that should guide the design of these materials to optimally support informed decision-making. RESULTS: In general, participants viewed the educational materials as insufficient to support informed decision-making. They identified the following key features of optimal educational materials: they should be accessible, complete and accurate, and provide information on both benefits and risks of screening in a comprehensive, easy-to-understand manner. Information materials should evoke the trust of the reader, and they should be consistent across Canada. INTERPRETATION: Canadian women have insufficient access to reliable information sources and complete evidence about mammography screening, and, without this information, they are unable to make fully informed decisions. Canadian breast screening programs must take steps to improve the information shared with women to support informed decision-making that aligns with women’s values and preferences. Text Newfoundland Yukon PubMed Central (PMC) British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada Newfoundland Yukon CMAJ Open 7 4 E730 E737
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research
spellingShingle Research
Tripp, Laura
Abelson, Julia
Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study
topic_facet Research
description BACKGROUND: Women are encouraged to make informed choices about mammography screening that align with their values and preferences, yet information materials developed by screening programs rarely provide complete, balanced information about screening. Through a series of deliberations with Ontario citizens, we elicited perspectives on materials developed by screening programs to support informed decision-making. METHODS: We held 4 deliberative engagement events with citizens to discuss the current evidence about mammography and informed decision-making for the general population (i.e., women not at high risk) in the context of organized screening programs. Participants reviewed and provided feedback on the educational materials currently produced by screening programs in 8 provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador) and 2 territories (Yukon Territory and Northwest Territory) and identified the key features that should guide the design of these materials to optimally support informed decision-making. RESULTS: In general, participants viewed the educational materials as insufficient to support informed decision-making. They identified the following key features of optimal educational materials: they should be accessible, complete and accurate, and provide information on both benefits and risks of screening in a comprehensive, easy-to-understand manner. Information materials should evoke the trust of the reader, and they should be consistent across Canada. INTERPRETATION: Canadian women have insufficient access to reliable information sources and complete evidence about mammography screening, and, without this information, they are unable to make fully informed decisions. Canadian breast screening programs must take steps to improve the information shared with women to support informed decision-making that aligns with women’s values and preferences.
format Text
author Tripp, Laura
Abelson, Julia
author_facet Tripp, Laura
Abelson, Julia
author_sort Tripp, Laura
title Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study
title_short Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study
title_full Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study
title_fullStr Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study
title_full_unstemmed Supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study
title_sort supporting women at average risk to make informed decisions about mammography when there is no “right” answer: a qualitative citizen deliberation study
publisher Joule Inc. or its licensors
publishDate 2019
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910141/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31836630
https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190102
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic British Columbia
Canada
Newfoundland
Yukon
geographic_facet British Columbia
Canada
Newfoundland
Yukon
genre Newfoundland
Yukon
genre_facet Newfoundland
Yukon
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910141/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31836630
http://dx.doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190102
op_rights Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors
op_doi https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190102
container_title CMAJ Open
container_volume 7
container_issue 4
container_start_page E730
op_container_end_page E737
_version_ 1766109644451741696