Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of the Maternity Experiences Survey, a cross-sectional survey covering different aspects of pregnancy, labour, birth and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Main Authors: Abdullah, Peri, Landy, Christine Kurtz, McCague, Hugh, Macpherson, Alison, Tamim, Hala
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509859/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31077167
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2309-4
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6509859
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6509859 2023-05-15T17:22:54+02:00 Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada Abdullah, Peri Landy, Christine Kurtz McCague, Hugh Macpherson, Alison Tamim, Hala 2019-05-10 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509859/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31077167 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2309-4 en eng BioMed Central http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509859/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31077167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2309-4 © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. CC0 PDM CC-BY Research Article Text 2019 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2309-4 2019-06-09T00:11:45Z BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of the Maternity Experiences Survey, a cross-sectional survey covering different aspects of pregnancy, labour, birth and the post-partum period. Bivariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regressions were performed to assess the relationship between timing of first prenatal ultrasound and different independent variables. RESULTS: 68.4% of Canadian women received an optimally timed first prenatal ultrasound, 27.4% received early ultrasounds and 4.3% received late ultrasound. The highest prevalence of early ultrasound was in Ontario (33.3%) and the lowest was in Manitoba (13.3%). The highest prevalence of late ultrasound was found in Manitoba (12.1%) and the lowest was in British Columbia and Ontario (3.5% each). The highest prevalence of optimal timing of first prenatal ultrasound was in Quebec (77%) and the lowest was in Ontario (63.2%). Factors influencing the timing of ultrasound included: Early – maternal age < 20 (adjusted OR = 0.54, 95%CI:0.34–0.84), alcohol use during pregnancy (adjusted OR = 0.69, 95%CI:0.53–0.90), history of premature birth (adjusted OR = 1.41, 95%CI:1.06–1.89), multiparity (adjusted OR = 0.67, 95%CI:0.57–0.78), born outside of Canada (adjusted OR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.67–0.99), prenatal care in Newfoundland and Labrador (adjusted OR = 1.66, 95%CI:1.20–1.30), Nova Scotia (adjusted OR = 1.68, 95%CI:1.25–2.28), Ontario (adjusted OR = 2.16, 95%CI:1.76–2.65), Saskatchewan (adjusted OR = 1.50, 95%CI:1.05–2.14), Alberta (adjusted OR = 1.37, 95%CI:1.05–1.77) British Columbia (adjusted OR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.45–2.50) and Manitoba (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95%CI:0.45–0.98) Late – unintended pregnancy (adjusted OR = 1.89, 95%CI:1.38–2.59), born outside of Canada (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95%CI:1.14–2.68), prenatal care in Manitoba (adjusted OR = 2.88, 95%CI:1.64–5.05) and the Territories (adjusted OR = 4.50, 95%CI:2.27–8.93). An ... Text Newfoundland PubMed Central (PMC) British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Canada Newfoundland BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19 1
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research Article
spellingShingle Research Article
Abdullah, Peri
Landy, Christine Kurtz
McCague, Hugh
Macpherson, Alison
Tamim, Hala
Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada
topic_facet Research Article
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of the Maternity Experiences Survey, a cross-sectional survey covering different aspects of pregnancy, labour, birth and the post-partum period. Bivariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regressions were performed to assess the relationship between timing of first prenatal ultrasound and different independent variables. RESULTS: 68.4% of Canadian women received an optimally timed first prenatal ultrasound, 27.4% received early ultrasounds and 4.3% received late ultrasound. The highest prevalence of early ultrasound was in Ontario (33.3%) and the lowest was in Manitoba (13.3%). The highest prevalence of late ultrasound was found in Manitoba (12.1%) and the lowest was in British Columbia and Ontario (3.5% each). The highest prevalence of optimal timing of first prenatal ultrasound was in Quebec (77%) and the lowest was in Ontario (63.2%). Factors influencing the timing of ultrasound included: Early – maternal age < 20 (adjusted OR = 0.54, 95%CI:0.34–0.84), alcohol use during pregnancy (adjusted OR = 0.69, 95%CI:0.53–0.90), history of premature birth (adjusted OR = 1.41, 95%CI:1.06–1.89), multiparity (adjusted OR = 0.67, 95%CI:0.57–0.78), born outside of Canada (adjusted OR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.67–0.99), prenatal care in Newfoundland and Labrador (adjusted OR = 1.66, 95%CI:1.20–1.30), Nova Scotia (adjusted OR = 1.68, 95%CI:1.25–2.28), Ontario (adjusted OR = 2.16, 95%CI:1.76–2.65), Saskatchewan (adjusted OR = 1.50, 95%CI:1.05–2.14), Alberta (adjusted OR = 1.37, 95%CI:1.05–1.77) British Columbia (adjusted OR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.45–2.50) and Manitoba (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95%CI:0.45–0.98) Late – unintended pregnancy (adjusted OR = 1.89, 95%CI:1.38–2.59), born outside of Canada (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95%CI:1.14–2.68), prenatal care in Manitoba (adjusted OR = 2.88, 95%CI:1.64–5.05) and the Territories (adjusted OR = 4.50, 95%CI:2.27–8.93). An ...
format Text
author Abdullah, Peri
Landy, Christine Kurtz
McCague, Hugh
Macpherson, Alison
Tamim, Hala
author_facet Abdullah, Peri
Landy, Christine Kurtz
McCague, Hugh
Macpherson, Alison
Tamim, Hala
author_sort Abdullah, Peri
title Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada
title_short Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada
title_full Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada
title_fullStr Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada
title_sort factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in canada
publisher BioMed Central
publishDate 2019
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509859/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31077167
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2309-4
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic British Columbia
Canada
Newfoundland
geographic_facet British Columbia
Canada
Newfoundland
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6509859/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31077167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2309-4
op_rights © The Author(s). 2019
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
op_rightsnorm CC0
PDM
CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2309-4
container_title BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
container_volume 19
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766109811829637120