PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.

The objective of this study was to compare meat fatty acid attributes (stearic acid, oleic acid) and edible meat yield from three different species of cervids. Twenty-nine mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus; OH), 22 moose (Alces alces; AA), and 21 Elk (Cervus canadensis; CC) were harvested from North Da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Animal Science
Main Authors: Reed, D, Berg, E, Sun, X, Berg, P
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6285546/
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.153
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6285546
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6285546 2023-05-15T13:13:23+02:00 PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat. Reed, D Berg, E Sun, X Berg, P 2018-12 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6285546/ https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.153 en eng Oxford University Press http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6285546/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.153 © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Abstracts Text 2018 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.153 2019-12-08T01:20:19Z The objective of this study was to compare meat fatty acid attributes (stearic acid, oleic acid) and edible meat yield from three different species of cervids. Twenty-nine mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus; OH), 22 moose (Alces alces; AA), and 21 Elk (Cervus canadensis; CC) were harvested from North Dakota and processed in the meat lab at North Dakota State University. All of the data were subjected to an ANOVA. All of the outliers were identified and removed before final analysis. The least squared mean significant differences (LSMEAN) were calculated at a 5% significance level to compare the treatment means. SAS statistical software (V 9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) was used for the ANOVA. Fatty acid analysis methods for stearic and oleic acid for each species according to AOAC # 996.06. Yield data were also collected and compared across species to include shot loss and lean availability. OH and CC exhibited higher percentages of intramuscular oleic acid (OH, 24.1%; CC, 29.7%) than AA (14.5%, p<.01).Mule deer had the highest stearic acid content (24.7 %). For yield data, OH reached the highest lean availability (64.44%), followed by CC at 59.35%, with AA the lowest (56.05%). This research found that mule deer and elk have more desirable MUFA and SFA content than moose with the highest lean yield percentage of meat from mule deer. Text Alces alces PubMed Central (PMC) Journal of Animal Science 96 suppl_3 69 70
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Abstracts
spellingShingle Abstracts
Reed, D
Berg, E
Sun, X
Berg, P
PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.
topic_facet Abstracts
description The objective of this study was to compare meat fatty acid attributes (stearic acid, oleic acid) and edible meat yield from three different species of cervids. Twenty-nine mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus; OH), 22 moose (Alces alces; AA), and 21 Elk (Cervus canadensis; CC) were harvested from North Dakota and processed in the meat lab at North Dakota State University. All of the data were subjected to an ANOVA. All of the outliers were identified and removed before final analysis. The least squared mean significant differences (LSMEAN) were calculated at a 5% significance level to compare the treatment means. SAS statistical software (V 9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) was used for the ANOVA. Fatty acid analysis methods for stearic and oleic acid for each species according to AOAC # 996.06. Yield data were also collected and compared across species to include shot loss and lean availability. OH and CC exhibited higher percentages of intramuscular oleic acid (OH, 24.1%; CC, 29.7%) than AA (14.5%, p<.01).Mule deer had the highest stearic acid content (24.7 %). For yield data, OH reached the highest lean availability (64.44%), followed by CC at 59.35%, with AA the lowest (56.05%). This research found that mule deer and elk have more desirable MUFA and SFA content than moose with the highest lean yield percentage of meat from mule deer.
format Text
author Reed, D
Berg, E
Sun, X
Berg, P
author_facet Reed, D
Berg, E
Sun, X
Berg, P
author_sort Reed, D
title PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.
title_short PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.
title_full PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.
title_fullStr PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.
title_full_unstemmed PSII-1 A comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.
title_sort psii-1 a comparison of fatty acid attributes and edible meat yield percentage in different species of deer meat.
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2018
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6285546/
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.153
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6285546/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.153
op_rights © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky404.153
container_title Journal of Animal Science
container_volume 96
container_issue suppl_3
container_start_page 69
op_container_end_page 70
_version_ 1766258053486739456