Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators

Where direct killing is rare and niche overlap low, sympatric carnivores may appear to coexist without conflict. Interference interactions, harassment and injury from larger carnivores may still pose a risk to smaller mesopredators. Foraging theory suggests that animals should adjust their behaviour...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oecologia
Main Authors: Haswell, Peter M., Jones, Katherine A., Kusak, Josip, Hayward, Matt W.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018578/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654482
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6018578
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:6018578 2023-05-15T15:50:41+02:00 Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators Haswell, Peter M. Jones, Katherine A. Kusak, Josip Hayward, Matt W. 2018-04-13 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018578/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654482 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3 en eng Springer Berlin Heidelberg http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018578/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3 © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. CC-BY Highlighted Student Research Text 2018 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3 2018-07-15T00:12:16Z Where direct killing is rare and niche overlap low, sympatric carnivores may appear to coexist without conflict. Interference interactions, harassment and injury from larger carnivores may still pose a risk to smaller mesopredators. Foraging theory suggests that animals should adjust their behaviour accordingly to optimise foraging efficiency and overall fitness, trading off harvest rate with costs to fitness. The foraging behaviour of red foxes, Vulpes vulpes, was studied with automated cameras and a repeated measures giving-up density (GUD) experiment where olfactory risk cues were manipulated. In Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia, red foxes increased GUDs by 34% and quitting harvest rates by 29% in response to wolf urine. In addition to leaving more food behind, foxes also responded to wolf urine by spending less time visiting food patches each day and altering their behaviour in order to compensate for the increased risk when foraging from patches. Thus, red foxes utilised olfaction to assess risk and experienced foraging costs due to the presence of a cue from gray wolves, Canis lupus. This study identifies behavioural mechanisms which may enable competing predators to coexist, and highlights the potential for additional ecosystem service pathways arising from the behaviour of large carnivores. Given the vulnerability of large carnivores to anthropogenic disturbance, a growing human population and intensifying resource consumption, it becomes increasingly important to understand ecological processes so that land can be managed appropriately. Text Canis lupus PubMed Central (PMC) Oecologia 187 3 573 583
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Highlighted Student Research
spellingShingle Highlighted Student Research
Haswell, Peter M.
Jones, Katherine A.
Kusak, Josip
Hayward, Matt W.
Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators
topic_facet Highlighted Student Research
description Where direct killing is rare and niche overlap low, sympatric carnivores may appear to coexist without conflict. Interference interactions, harassment and injury from larger carnivores may still pose a risk to smaller mesopredators. Foraging theory suggests that animals should adjust their behaviour accordingly to optimise foraging efficiency and overall fitness, trading off harvest rate with costs to fitness. The foraging behaviour of red foxes, Vulpes vulpes, was studied with automated cameras and a repeated measures giving-up density (GUD) experiment where olfactory risk cues were manipulated. In Plitvice Lakes National Park, Croatia, red foxes increased GUDs by 34% and quitting harvest rates by 29% in response to wolf urine. In addition to leaving more food behind, foxes also responded to wolf urine by spending less time visiting food patches each day and altering their behaviour in order to compensate for the increased risk when foraging from patches. Thus, red foxes utilised olfaction to assess risk and experienced foraging costs due to the presence of a cue from gray wolves, Canis lupus. This study identifies behavioural mechanisms which may enable competing predators to coexist, and highlights the potential for additional ecosystem service pathways arising from the behaviour of large carnivores. Given the vulnerability of large carnivores to anthropogenic disturbance, a growing human population and intensifying resource consumption, it becomes increasingly important to understand ecological processes so that land can be managed appropriately.
format Text
author Haswell, Peter M.
Jones, Katherine A.
Kusak, Josip
Hayward, Matt W.
author_facet Haswell, Peter M.
Jones, Katherine A.
Kusak, Josip
Hayward, Matt W.
author_sort Haswell, Peter M.
title Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators
title_short Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators
title_full Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators
title_fullStr Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators
title_full_unstemmed Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators
title_sort fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
publishDate 2018
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018578/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654482
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018578/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3
op_rights © The Author(s) 2018
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 187
container_issue 3
container_start_page 573
op_container_end_page 583
_version_ 1766385686766682112