Catchment vegetation and temperature mediating trophic interactions and production in plankton communities

• Published in: PLOS ONE
• Main Authors: Finstad, Anders G., Nilsen, Erlend B., Hendrichsen, Ditte K., Schmidt, Niels Martin
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science 2017
• Subjects: Research Article; Arctic; Climate change; Phytoplankton; Zooplankton
• Online Access: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393547/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28414736; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174904

Climatic factors influence the interactions among trophic levels in an ecosystem in multiple ways. However, whereas most studies focus on single factors in isolation, mainly due to interrelation and correlation among drivers complicating interpretation and analyses, there are still only few studies on how multiple ecosystems respond to climate related factors at the same time. Here, we use a hierarchical Bayesian model with a bioenergetic predator-prey framework to study how different climatic factors affect trophic interactions and production in small Arctic lakes. Natural variation in temperature and catchment land-cover was used as a natural experiment to exemplify how interactions between and production of primary producers (phytoplankton) and grazers (zooplankton) are driven by direct (temperature) and indirect (catchment vegetation) factors, as well as the presence or absence of apex predators (fish). The results show that increased vegetation cover increased phytoplankton growth rate by mediating lake nutrient concentration. At the same time, increased temperature also increased grazing rates by zooplankton. Presence of fish increased zooplankton mortality rates, thus reducing grazing. The Arctic is currently experiencing an increase in both temperature and shrub vegetation cover due to climate change, a trend, which is likely to continue. Our results point towards a possible future general weakening of zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton and greening of arctic lakes with increasing temperatures. At the same time, the impact of the presence of an apex predator indicate considerable local variation in the response. This makes direction and strength of global change impacts difficult to forecast.