Using effect size benchmarks to assess when alien impacts are actually alien

• Published in: Scientific Reports
• Main Authors: Smith, Helen M., Dickman, Chris R., Banks, Peter B.
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017
• Subjects: Article; Rattus rattus
• Online Access: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5269578/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28128305; https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38627

Alien predators have on average twice the impact on native prey populations than do native predators, and are a severe threat to wildlife globally. Manipulation experiments can be used to quantify the impact of an alien predator on its prey population/s, but unless the results are compared to benchmarks, it is unclear whether this impact is indeed greater than that of a native predator. Here we use the Australian garden skink Lampropholis delicata and alien black rat Rattus rattus to test if black rats are an additive source of predation for the skink, and to judge whether the effect size of rat-impact on the skink represents that of an alien or native predator. We used replicated experiments to exclude black rats at local and landscape scales to test how rats affect skink activity and trapping frequency. Both manipulations had positive effects on skinks, however, the population-level effect size was lower than that described for alien predators but similar to that expected for native predators. We suggest that Australian skinks may respond appropriately to predatory alien rats because they coevolved with endemic Rattus species. This adds novel insights into the varying levels of impact that alien predators have on native prey.