Toward a trophic theory of species diversity

Efforts to understand the ecological regulation of species diversity via bottom-up approaches have failed to yield a consensus theory. Theories based on the alternative of top-down regulation have fared better. Paine’s discovery of keystone predation demonstrated that the regulation of diversity via...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Main Author: Terborgh, John W.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: National Academy of Sciences 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577191/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374788
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501070112
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4577191
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4577191 2023-05-15T15:10:00+02:00 Toward a trophic theory of species diversity Terborgh, John W. 2015-09-15 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577191/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374788 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501070112 en eng National Academy of Sciences http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577191/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501070112 Perspective Text 2015 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501070112 2016-03-20T01:05:18Z Efforts to understand the ecological regulation of species diversity via bottom-up approaches have failed to yield a consensus theory. Theories based on the alternative of top-down regulation have fared better. Paine’s discovery of keystone predation demonstrated that the regulation of diversity via top-down forcing could be simple, strong, and direct, yet ecologists have persistently failed to perceive generality in Paine’s result. Removing top predators destabilizes many systems and drives transitions to radically distinct alternative states. These transitions typically involve community reorganization and loss of diversity, implying that top-down forcing is crucial to diversity maintenance. Contrary to the expectations of bottom-up theories, many terrestrial herbivores and mesopredators are capable of sustained order-of-magnitude population increases following release from predation, negating the assumption that populations of primary consumers are resource limited and at or near carrying capacity. Predation sensu lato (to include Janzen–Connell mortality agents) has been shown to promote diversity in a wide range of ecosystems, including rocky intertidal shelves, coral reefs, the nearshore ocean, streams, lakes, temperate and tropical forests, and arctic tundra. The compelling variety of these ecosystems suggests that top-down forcing plays a universal role in regulating diversity. This conclusion is further supported by studies showing that the reduction or absence of predation leads to diversity loss and, in the more dramatic cases, to catastrophic regime change. Here, I expand on the thesis that diversity is maintained by the interaction between predation and competition, such that strong top-down forcing reduces competition, allowing coexistence. Text Arctic Tundra PubMed Central (PMC) Arctic Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 37 11415 11422
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Perspective
spellingShingle Perspective
Terborgh, John W.
Toward a trophic theory of species diversity
topic_facet Perspective
description Efforts to understand the ecological regulation of species diversity via bottom-up approaches have failed to yield a consensus theory. Theories based on the alternative of top-down regulation have fared better. Paine’s discovery of keystone predation demonstrated that the regulation of diversity via top-down forcing could be simple, strong, and direct, yet ecologists have persistently failed to perceive generality in Paine’s result. Removing top predators destabilizes many systems and drives transitions to radically distinct alternative states. These transitions typically involve community reorganization and loss of diversity, implying that top-down forcing is crucial to diversity maintenance. Contrary to the expectations of bottom-up theories, many terrestrial herbivores and mesopredators are capable of sustained order-of-magnitude population increases following release from predation, negating the assumption that populations of primary consumers are resource limited and at or near carrying capacity. Predation sensu lato (to include Janzen–Connell mortality agents) has been shown to promote diversity in a wide range of ecosystems, including rocky intertidal shelves, coral reefs, the nearshore ocean, streams, lakes, temperate and tropical forests, and arctic tundra. The compelling variety of these ecosystems suggests that top-down forcing plays a universal role in regulating diversity. This conclusion is further supported by studies showing that the reduction or absence of predation leads to diversity loss and, in the more dramatic cases, to catastrophic regime change. Here, I expand on the thesis that diversity is maintained by the interaction between predation and competition, such that strong top-down forcing reduces competition, allowing coexistence.
format Text
author Terborgh, John W.
author_facet Terborgh, John W.
author_sort Terborgh, John W.
title Toward a trophic theory of species diversity
title_short Toward a trophic theory of species diversity
title_full Toward a trophic theory of species diversity
title_fullStr Toward a trophic theory of species diversity
title_full_unstemmed Toward a trophic theory of species diversity
title_sort toward a trophic theory of species diversity
publisher National Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2015
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577191/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374788
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501070112
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Tundra
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4577191/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501070112
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501070112
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
container_volume 112
container_issue 37
container_start_page 11415
op_container_end_page 11422
_version_ 1766341083857420288