The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs

Exploration is important for animals to be able to gather information about features of their environment that may directly or indirectly influence survival and reproduction. Closely related to exploration is neophobia, which may reduce exposure to danger, but also constrain explorative behaviour. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Behaviour
Main Authors: Moretti, Lucia, Hentrup, Marleen, Kotrschal, Kurt, Range, Friederike
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Academic Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550430/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4550430
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4550430 2023-05-15T15:50:40+02:00 The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs Moretti, Lucia Hentrup, Marleen Kotrschal, Kurt Range, Friederike 2015-09 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550430/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008 en eng Academic Press http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550430/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008 © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). CC-BY-NC-ND Article Text 2015 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008 2015-09-27T00:09:07Z Exploration is important for animals to be able to gather information about features of their environment that may directly or indirectly influence survival and reproduction. Closely related to exploration is neophobia, which may reduce exposure to danger, but also constrain explorative behaviour. Here we investigated the effects of social relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves, Canis lupus, and dogs, Canis familiaris. Eleven pack-living wolves reared by human foster parents and 13 identically raised and kept dogs were tested in a novel object test under three different conditions: (1) alone, (2) paired with a pack mate and (3) together with the entire pack. Dogs were less neophobic than wolves and interacted faster with the novel objects. However, the dogs showed overall less interest in the novel objects than wolves, which investigated the objects for longer than the dogs. Both wolves and dogs manipulated objects for longer when paired or in the pack than when alone. While kinship facilitated the investigation of novel objects in the pair condition in both wolves and dogs, rank distance had opposite effects. Our results suggest that the presence of conspecifics supported the exploration of novel objects in both wolves and dogs, particularly within kin and that this may be interpreted as risk sharing. The reduced latency to approach objects and less time spent exploring objects in dogs compared to wolves may be interpreted as an effect of domestication. Text Canis lupus PubMed Central (PMC) Animal Behaviour 107 159 173
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Article
spellingShingle Article
Moretti, Lucia
Hentrup, Marleen
Kotrschal, Kurt
Range, Friederike
The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
topic_facet Article
description Exploration is important for animals to be able to gather information about features of their environment that may directly or indirectly influence survival and reproduction. Closely related to exploration is neophobia, which may reduce exposure to danger, but also constrain explorative behaviour. Here we investigated the effects of social relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves, Canis lupus, and dogs, Canis familiaris. Eleven pack-living wolves reared by human foster parents and 13 identically raised and kept dogs were tested in a novel object test under three different conditions: (1) alone, (2) paired with a pack mate and (3) together with the entire pack. Dogs were less neophobic than wolves and interacted faster with the novel objects. However, the dogs showed overall less interest in the novel objects than wolves, which investigated the objects for longer than the dogs. Both wolves and dogs manipulated objects for longer when paired or in the pack than when alone. While kinship facilitated the investigation of novel objects in the pair condition in both wolves and dogs, rank distance had opposite effects. Our results suggest that the presence of conspecifics supported the exploration of novel objects in both wolves and dogs, particularly within kin and that this may be interpreted as risk sharing. The reduced latency to approach objects and less time spent exploring objects in dogs compared to wolves may be interpreted as an effect of domestication.
format Text
author Moretti, Lucia
Hentrup, Marleen
Kotrschal, Kurt
Range, Friederike
author_facet Moretti, Lucia
Hentrup, Marleen
Kotrschal, Kurt
Range, Friederike
author_sort Moretti, Lucia
title The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
title_short The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
title_full The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
title_fullStr The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
title_full_unstemmed The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
title_sort influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
publisher Academic Press
publishDate 2015
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550430/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550430/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008
op_rights © 2015 The Authors
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008
container_title Animal Behaviour
container_volume 107
container_start_page 159
op_container_end_page 173
_version_ 1766385670122635264