Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison
An intriguing aspect of social foraging behaviour is that large groups are often no better at capturing prey than are small groups, a pattern that has been attributed to diminished cooperation (i.e., free riding) in large groups. Although this suggests the formation of large groups is unrelated to p...
Published in: | PLoS ONE |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229308 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 |
id |
ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4229308 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4229308 2023-05-15T15:50:30+02:00 Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison MacNulty, Daniel R. Tallian, Aimee Stahler, Daniel R. Smith, Douglas W. 2014-11-12 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229308 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 en eng Public Library of Science http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. PDM CC0 Research Article Text 2014 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 2014-11-23T00:55:47Z An intriguing aspect of social foraging behaviour is that large groups are often no better at capturing prey than are small groups, a pattern that has been attributed to diminished cooperation (i.e., free riding) in large groups. Although this suggests the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture, little is known about cooperation in large groups that hunt hard-to-catch prey. Here, we used direct observations of Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus) hunting their most formidable prey, bison (Bison bison), to test the hypothesis that large groups are more cooperative when hunting difficult prey. We quantified the relationship between capture success and wolf group size, and compared it to previously reported results for Yellowstone wolves hunting elk (Cervus elaphus), a prey that was, on average, 3 times easier to capture than bison. Whereas improvement in elk capture success levelled off at 2–6 wolves, bison capture success levelled off at 9–13 wolves with evidence that it continued to increase beyond 13 wolves. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that hunters in large groups are more cooperative when hunting more formidable prey. Improved ability to capture formidable prey could therefore promote the formation and maintenance of large predator groups, particularly among predators that specialize on such prey. Text Canis lupus Bison bison bison PubMed Central (PMC) PLoS ONE 9 11 e112884 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
PubMed Central (PMC) |
op_collection_id |
ftpubmed |
language |
English |
topic |
Research Article |
spellingShingle |
Research Article MacNulty, Daniel R. Tallian, Aimee Stahler, Daniel R. Smith, Douglas W. Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison |
topic_facet |
Research Article |
description |
An intriguing aspect of social foraging behaviour is that large groups are often no better at capturing prey than are small groups, a pattern that has been attributed to diminished cooperation (i.e., free riding) in large groups. Although this suggests the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture, little is known about cooperation in large groups that hunt hard-to-catch prey. Here, we used direct observations of Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus) hunting their most formidable prey, bison (Bison bison), to test the hypothesis that large groups are more cooperative when hunting difficult prey. We quantified the relationship between capture success and wolf group size, and compared it to previously reported results for Yellowstone wolves hunting elk (Cervus elaphus), a prey that was, on average, 3 times easier to capture than bison. Whereas improvement in elk capture success levelled off at 2–6 wolves, bison capture success levelled off at 9–13 wolves with evidence that it continued to increase beyond 13 wolves. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that hunters in large groups are more cooperative when hunting more formidable prey. Improved ability to capture formidable prey could therefore promote the formation and maintenance of large predator groups, particularly among predators that specialize on such prey. |
format |
Text |
author |
MacNulty, Daniel R. Tallian, Aimee Stahler, Daniel R. Smith, Douglas W. |
author_facet |
MacNulty, Daniel R. Tallian, Aimee Stahler, Daniel R. Smith, Douglas W. |
author_sort |
MacNulty, Daniel R. |
title |
Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison |
title_short |
Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison |
title_full |
Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison |
title_fullStr |
Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison |
title_sort |
influence of group size on the success of wolves hunting bison |
publisher |
Public Library of Science |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229308 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 |
genre |
Canis lupus Bison bison bison |
genre_facet |
Canis lupus Bison bison bison |
op_relation |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 |
op_rights |
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. |
op_rightsnorm |
PDM CC0 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 |
container_title |
PLoS ONE |
container_volume |
9 |
container_issue |
11 |
container_start_page |
e112884 |
_version_ |
1766385460124319744 |