Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison

An intriguing aspect of social foraging behaviour is that large groups are often no better at capturing prey than are small groups, a pattern that has been attributed to diminished cooperation (i.e., free riding) in large groups. Although this suggests the formation of large groups is unrelated to p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Authors: MacNulty, Daniel R., Tallian, Aimee, Stahler, Daniel R., Smith, Douglas W.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229308
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4229308
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4229308 2023-05-15T15:50:30+02:00 Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison MacNulty, Daniel R. Tallian, Aimee Stahler, Daniel R. Smith, Douglas W. 2014-11-12 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229308 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 en eng Public Library of Science http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. PDM CC0 Research Article Text 2014 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884 2014-11-23T00:55:47Z An intriguing aspect of social foraging behaviour is that large groups are often no better at capturing prey than are small groups, a pattern that has been attributed to diminished cooperation (i.e., free riding) in large groups. Although this suggests the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture, little is known about cooperation in large groups that hunt hard-to-catch prey. Here, we used direct observations of Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus) hunting their most formidable prey, bison (Bison bison), to test the hypothesis that large groups are more cooperative when hunting difficult prey. We quantified the relationship between capture success and wolf group size, and compared it to previously reported results for Yellowstone wolves hunting elk (Cervus elaphus), a prey that was, on average, 3 times easier to capture than bison. Whereas improvement in elk capture success levelled off at 2–6 wolves, bison capture success levelled off at 9–13 wolves with evidence that it continued to increase beyond 13 wolves. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that hunters in large groups are more cooperative when hunting more formidable prey. Improved ability to capture formidable prey could therefore promote the formation and maintenance of large predator groups, particularly among predators that specialize on such prey. Text Canis lupus Bison bison bison PubMed Central (PMC) PLoS ONE 9 11 e112884
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research Article
spellingShingle Research Article
MacNulty, Daniel R.
Tallian, Aimee
Stahler, Daniel R.
Smith, Douglas W.
Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison
topic_facet Research Article
description An intriguing aspect of social foraging behaviour is that large groups are often no better at capturing prey than are small groups, a pattern that has been attributed to diminished cooperation (i.e., free riding) in large groups. Although this suggests the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture, little is known about cooperation in large groups that hunt hard-to-catch prey. Here, we used direct observations of Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus) hunting their most formidable prey, bison (Bison bison), to test the hypothesis that large groups are more cooperative when hunting difficult prey. We quantified the relationship between capture success and wolf group size, and compared it to previously reported results for Yellowstone wolves hunting elk (Cervus elaphus), a prey that was, on average, 3 times easier to capture than bison. Whereas improvement in elk capture success levelled off at 2–6 wolves, bison capture success levelled off at 9–13 wolves with evidence that it continued to increase beyond 13 wolves. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that hunters in large groups are more cooperative when hunting more formidable prey. Improved ability to capture formidable prey could therefore promote the formation and maintenance of large predator groups, particularly among predators that specialize on such prey.
format Text
author MacNulty, Daniel R.
Tallian, Aimee
Stahler, Daniel R.
Smith, Douglas W.
author_facet MacNulty, Daniel R.
Tallian, Aimee
Stahler, Daniel R.
Smith, Douglas W.
author_sort MacNulty, Daniel R.
title Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison
title_short Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison
title_full Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison
title_fullStr Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Group Size on the Success of Wolves Hunting Bison
title_sort influence of group size on the success of wolves hunting bison
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2014
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229308
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884
genre Canis lupus
Bison bison bison
genre_facet Canis lupus
Bison bison bison
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884
op_rights This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
op_rightsnorm PDM
CC0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112884
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 9
container_issue 11
container_start_page e112884
_version_ 1766385460124319744