Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles

Polar oceans are chemically sensitive to anthropogenic acidification due to their relatively low alkalinity and correspondingly weak carbonate buffering capacity. Here, we compare unique CO2 system observations covering complete annual cycles at an Arctic (Amundsen Gulf) and Antarctic site (Prydz Ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific Reports
Main Authors: Shadwick, E. H., Trull, T. W., Thomas, H., Gibson, J. A. E.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730166
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903871
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02339
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3730166
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3730166 2023-05-15T13:22:55+02:00 Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles Shadwick, E. H. Trull, T. W. Thomas, H. Gibson, J. A. E. 2013-08-01 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730166 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903871 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02339 en eng Nature Publishing Group http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730166 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02339 Copyright © 2013, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ CC-BY Article Text 2013 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02339 2013-09-05T03:18:04Z Polar oceans are chemically sensitive to anthropogenic acidification due to their relatively low alkalinity and correspondingly weak carbonate buffering capacity. Here, we compare unique CO2 system observations covering complete annual cycles at an Arctic (Amundsen Gulf) and Antarctic site (Prydz Bay). The Arctic site experiences greater seasonal warming (10 vs 3°C), and freshening (3 vs 2), has lower alkalinity (2220 vs 2320 μmol/kg), and lower summer pH (8.15 vs 8.5), than the Antarctic site. Despite a larger uptake of inorganic carbon by summer photosynthesis, the Arctic carbon system exhibits smaller seasonal changes than the more alkaline Antarctic system. In addition, the excess surface nutrients in the Antarctic may allow mitigation of acidification, via CO2 removal by enhanced summer production driven by iron inputs from glacial and sea-ice melting. These differences suggest that the Arctic system is more vulnerable to anthropogenic change due to lower alkalinity, enhanced warming, and nutrient limitation. Text Amundsen Gulf Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Prydz Bay Sea ice PubMed Central (PMC) Antarctic Arctic Prydz Bay The Antarctic Scientific Reports 3 1
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Article
spellingShingle Article
Shadwick, E. H.
Trull, T. W.
Thomas, H.
Gibson, J. A. E.
Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles
topic_facet Article
description Polar oceans are chemically sensitive to anthropogenic acidification due to their relatively low alkalinity and correspondingly weak carbonate buffering capacity. Here, we compare unique CO2 system observations covering complete annual cycles at an Arctic (Amundsen Gulf) and Antarctic site (Prydz Bay). The Arctic site experiences greater seasonal warming (10 vs 3°C), and freshening (3 vs 2), has lower alkalinity (2220 vs 2320 μmol/kg), and lower summer pH (8.15 vs 8.5), than the Antarctic site. Despite a larger uptake of inorganic carbon by summer photosynthesis, the Arctic carbon system exhibits smaller seasonal changes than the more alkaline Antarctic system. In addition, the excess surface nutrients in the Antarctic may allow mitigation of acidification, via CO2 removal by enhanced summer production driven by iron inputs from glacial and sea-ice melting. These differences suggest that the Arctic system is more vulnerable to anthropogenic change due to lower alkalinity, enhanced warming, and nutrient limitation.
format Text
author Shadwick, E. H.
Trull, T. W.
Thomas, H.
Gibson, J. A. E.
author_facet Shadwick, E. H.
Trull, T. W.
Thomas, H.
Gibson, J. A. E.
author_sort Shadwick, E. H.
title Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles
title_short Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles
title_full Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles
title_fullStr Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles
title_full_unstemmed Vulnerability of Polar Oceans to Anthropogenic Acidification: Comparison of Arctic and Antarctic Seasonal Cycles
title_sort vulnerability of polar oceans to anthropogenic acidification: comparison of arctic and antarctic seasonal cycles
publisher Nature Publishing Group
publishDate 2013
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730166
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903871
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02339
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
Prydz Bay
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
Prydz Bay
The Antarctic
genre Amundsen Gulf
Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Prydz Bay
Sea ice
genre_facet Amundsen Gulf
Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Prydz Bay
Sea ice
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3730166
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23903871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02339
op_rights Copyright © 2013, Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02339
container_title Scientific Reports
container_volume 3
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766367844763697152