Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus

In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanof...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Main Authors: Andriesse, G. I., Elberts, S., Vrolijk, A., Verhulst, C., Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Springer-Verlag 2010
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3022149
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3022149 2023-05-15T16:01:08+02:00 Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus Andriesse, G. I. Elberts, S. Vrolijk, A. Verhulst, C. Kluytmans, J. A. J. W. 2010-10-13 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 en eng Springer-Verlag http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 © The Author(s) 2010 Article Text 2010 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2 2013-09-03T10:01:59Z In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (“strain study”). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (“daily practice study”). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays. Text DML PubMed Central (PMC) Pasteur ENVELOPE(140.099,140.099,-66.625,-66.625) European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 30 2 259 264
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Article
spellingShingle Article
Andriesse, G. I.
Elberts, S.
Vrolijk, A.
Verhulst, C.
Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
topic_facet Article
description In this study, we evaluated a fourth-generation agglutination assay (Staph Plus; DiaMondiaL[DML]) for the rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. First, comparison with three third-generation assays (Slidex Staph Plus, bioMérieux; Staphaurex Plus, Murex Diagnostics; Pastorex Staph-Plus, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) was performed on a predefined strain collection: 265 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 266 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 262 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains (“strain study”). Second, patient material-derived strains (883 CNS, 847 MSSA and 135 MRSA) were tested concurrently with both the DML and Slidex assays (“daily practice study”). In the strain study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the DML, Slidex, Staphaurex and Pastorex assays were 99.2% and 100%, 98.1% and 100%, 95.2% and 100%, and 98.2% and 98.8%, respectively. Using the respective tests, the result was indeterminate in 0.0%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 1.5% of the strains. Overall, the sensitivity of the DML and Slidex assays were comparable in both sub-studies. However, in MRSA strains, the sensitivity of the DML assay was significantly lower than the Slidex assay. The specificity of the Slidex assay was significantly higher than the DML assay. However, the percentage of indeterminate results was much higher for the Slidex than the DML assay. In conclusion, the presumptive identification of S. aureus by the DML assay proved to be equal to third-generation latex agglutination assays.
format Text
author Andriesse, G. I.
Elberts, S.
Vrolijk, A.
Verhulst, C.
Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
author_facet Andriesse, G. I.
Elberts, S.
Vrolijk, A.
Verhulst, C.
Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.
author_sort Andriesse, G. I.
title Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_short Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_full Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort evaluation of a fourth-generation latex agglutination test for the identification of staphylococcus aureus
publisher Springer-Verlag
publishDate 2010
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
long_lat ENVELOPE(140.099,140.099,-66.625,-66.625)
geographic Pasteur
geographic_facet Pasteur
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022149
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20941519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
op_rights © The Author(s) 2010
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-1080-2
container_title European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
container_volume 30
container_issue 2
container_start_page 259
op_container_end_page 264
_version_ 1766397125156929536