Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data

Hundreds of thousands of seabirds are killed each year as bycatch in longline fisheries. Seabirds are predominantly caught during line setting but bycatch is generally recorded during line hauling, many hours after birds are caught. Bird loss during this interval may lead to inaccurate bycatch infor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Authors: Brothers, Nigel, Duckworth, Alan R., Safina, Carl, Gilman, Eric L.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2930863
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20824163
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012491
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2930863
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:2930863 2023-05-15T18:25:47+02:00 Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data Brothers, Nigel Duckworth, Alan R. Safina, Carl Gilman, Eric L. 2010-08-31 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2930863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20824163 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012491 en eng Public Library of Science http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2930863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20824163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012491 Brothers et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. CC-BY Research Article Text 2010 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012491 2013-09-03T04:15:53Z Hundreds of thousands of seabirds are killed each year as bycatch in longline fisheries. Seabirds are predominantly caught during line setting but bycatch is generally recorded during line hauling, many hours after birds are caught. Bird loss during this interval may lead to inaccurate bycatch information. In this 15 year study, seabird bycatch was recorded during both line setting and line hauling from four fishing regions: Indian Ocean, Southern Ocean, Coral Sea and central Pacific Ocean. Over 43,000 albatrosses, petrels and skuas representing over 25 species were counted during line setting of which almost 6,000 seabirds attempted to take the bait. Bait-taking interactions were placed into one of four categories. (i) The majority (57%) of bait-taking attempts were “unsuccessful” involving seabirds that did not take the bait nor get caught or hooked. (ii) One-third of attempts were “successful” with seabirds removing the bait while not getting caught. (iii) One-hundred and seventy-six seabirds (3% of attempts) were observed being “caught” during line setting, with three albatross species – Laysan (Phoebastria immutabilis), black-footed (P. nigripes) and black-browed (Thalassarche melanophrys)– dominating this category. However, of these, only 85 (48%) seabird carcasses were retrieved during line hauling. Most caught seabirds were hooked through the bill. (iv) The remainder of seabird-bait interactions (7%) was not clearly observed, but likely involved more “caught” seabirds. Bait taking attempts and percentage outcome (e.g. successful, caught) varied between seabird species and was not always related to species abundance around fishing vessels. Using only haul data to calculate seabird bycatch grossly underestimates actual bycatch levels, with the level of seabird bycatch from pelagic longline fishing possibly double what was previously thought. Text Southern Ocean PubMed Central (PMC) Indian Pacific Southern Ocean PLoS ONE 5 8 e12491
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research Article
spellingShingle Research Article
Brothers, Nigel
Duckworth, Alan R.
Safina, Carl
Gilman, Eric L.
Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data
topic_facet Research Article
description Hundreds of thousands of seabirds are killed each year as bycatch in longline fisheries. Seabirds are predominantly caught during line setting but bycatch is generally recorded during line hauling, many hours after birds are caught. Bird loss during this interval may lead to inaccurate bycatch information. In this 15 year study, seabird bycatch was recorded during both line setting and line hauling from four fishing regions: Indian Ocean, Southern Ocean, Coral Sea and central Pacific Ocean. Over 43,000 albatrosses, petrels and skuas representing over 25 species were counted during line setting of which almost 6,000 seabirds attempted to take the bait. Bait-taking interactions were placed into one of four categories. (i) The majority (57%) of bait-taking attempts were “unsuccessful” involving seabirds that did not take the bait nor get caught or hooked. (ii) One-third of attempts were “successful” with seabirds removing the bait while not getting caught. (iii) One-hundred and seventy-six seabirds (3% of attempts) were observed being “caught” during line setting, with three albatross species – Laysan (Phoebastria immutabilis), black-footed (P. nigripes) and black-browed (Thalassarche melanophrys)– dominating this category. However, of these, only 85 (48%) seabird carcasses were retrieved during line hauling. Most caught seabirds were hooked through the bill. (iv) The remainder of seabird-bait interactions (7%) was not clearly observed, but likely involved more “caught” seabirds. Bait taking attempts and percentage outcome (e.g. successful, caught) varied between seabird species and was not always related to species abundance around fishing vessels. Using only haul data to calculate seabird bycatch grossly underestimates actual bycatch levels, with the level of seabird bycatch from pelagic longline fishing possibly double what was previously thought.
format Text
author Brothers, Nigel
Duckworth, Alan R.
Safina, Carl
Gilman, Eric L.
author_facet Brothers, Nigel
Duckworth, Alan R.
Safina, Carl
Gilman, Eric L.
author_sort Brothers, Nigel
title Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data
title_short Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data
title_full Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data
title_fullStr Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data
title_full_unstemmed Seabird Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries Is Grossly Underestimated when Using Only Haul Data
title_sort seabird bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries is grossly underestimated when using only haul data
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2010
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2930863
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20824163
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012491
geographic Indian
Pacific
Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Indian
Pacific
Southern Ocean
genre Southern Ocean
genre_facet Southern Ocean
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2930863
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20824163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012491
op_rights Brothers et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012491
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 5
container_issue 8
container_start_page e12491
_version_ 1766207450838466560