Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction

Life-history theory predicts that increased current reproductive effort should lead to a fitness cost. This cost of reproduction may be observed as reduced survival or future reproduction, and may be caused by temporal suppression of immune function in stressed or hard-working individuals. In birds,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Main Authors: Hanssen, Sveinn Are, Hasselquist, Dennis, Folstad, Ivar, Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599870
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16024362
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3057
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1599870
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1599870 2023-05-15T15:55:57+02:00 Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction Hanssen, Sveinn Are Hasselquist, Dennis Folstad, Ivar Erikstad, Kjell Einar 2005-05-22 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599870 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16024362 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3057 en eng The Royal Society http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599870 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16024362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3057 © 2005 The Royal Society Research Article Text 2005 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3057 2013-08-31T08:17:29Z Life-history theory predicts that increased current reproductive effort should lead to a fitness cost. This cost of reproduction may be observed as reduced survival or future reproduction, and may be caused by temporal suppression of immune function in stressed or hard-working individuals. In birds, consideration of the costs of incubating eggs has largely been neglected in favour of the costs of brood rearing. We manipulated incubation demand in two breeding seasons (2000 and 2001) in female common eiders (Somateria mollissima) by creating clutches of three and six eggs (natural range 3–6 eggs). The common eider is a long-lived sea-duck where females do not eat during the incubation period. Mass loss increased and immune function (lymphocyte levels and specific antibody response to the non-pathogenic antigens diphtheria and tetanus toxoid) was reduced in females incubating large clutches. The increased incubation effort among females assigned to large incubation demand did not lead to adverse effects on current reproduction or return rate in the next breeding season. However, large incubation demand resulted in long-term fitness costs through reduced fecundity the year after manipulation. Our data show that in eiders, a long-lived species, the cost of high incubation demand is paid in the currency of reduced future fecundity, possibly mediated by reduced immune function. Text Common Eider Somateria mollissima PubMed Central (PMC) Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272 1567 1039 1046
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research Article
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Hasselquist, Dennis
Folstad, Ivar
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction
topic_facet Research Article
description Life-history theory predicts that increased current reproductive effort should lead to a fitness cost. This cost of reproduction may be observed as reduced survival or future reproduction, and may be caused by temporal suppression of immune function in stressed or hard-working individuals. In birds, consideration of the costs of incubating eggs has largely been neglected in favour of the costs of brood rearing. We manipulated incubation demand in two breeding seasons (2000 and 2001) in female common eiders (Somateria mollissima) by creating clutches of three and six eggs (natural range 3–6 eggs). The common eider is a long-lived sea-duck where females do not eat during the incubation period. Mass loss increased and immune function (lymphocyte levels and specific antibody response to the non-pathogenic antigens diphtheria and tetanus toxoid) was reduced in females incubating large clutches. The increased incubation effort among females assigned to large incubation demand did not lead to adverse effects on current reproduction or return rate in the next breeding season. However, large incubation demand resulted in long-term fitness costs through reduced fecundity the year after manipulation. Our data show that in eiders, a long-lived species, the cost of high incubation demand is paid in the currency of reduced future fecundity, possibly mediated by reduced immune function.
format Text
author Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Hasselquist, Dennis
Folstad, Ivar
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
author_facet Hanssen, Sveinn Are
Hasselquist, Dennis
Folstad, Ivar
Erikstad, Kjell Einar
author_sort Hanssen, Sveinn Are
title Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction
title_short Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction
title_full Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction
title_fullStr Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction
title_full_unstemmed Cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction
title_sort cost of reproduction in a long-lived bird: incubation effort reduces immune function and future reproduction
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2005
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599870
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16024362
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3057
genre Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
genre_facet Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599870
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16024362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3057
op_rights © 2005 The Royal Society
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3057
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
container_volume 272
container_issue 1567
container_start_page 1039
op_container_end_page 1046
_version_ 1766391429827919872